Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EndlessWire

(8,103 posts)
51. No member is reconsidering their membership.
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 07:55 AM
Mar 2022

Those that are "partners" all want in as rapidly as possible. That's because Russia is a big threatening bully. Without neighboring countries and NATO, Ukraine would have been done by now. NATO and friends sent them billions of dollars worth of war materials. To their credit, Ukrainians are fighting like hell, and refusing to give up or surrender. They are competent fighters, and making good use of what they are receiving.

We are sitting here watching a whole country be decimated by the neighborhood bully. Why? Because people are afraid of WW3 fought with nukes. So, even though we also have nukes, we can't have boots on the ground, or have a shoot em up with Russia. Putin knows that, because WE TOLD HIM. He tested the limits, and now he knows what he can do.

The Russians shot up ships and sank some, but nothing happened to them. Nothing will happen to them. There are few people who think that Putin will stop with Ukraine. He'll reconstitute his army and go again. Then, we'll get treated to more brutal conquest in other countries that are weaker militarily.

This desire to join NATO is not new for Ukraine. They were working for it, cleaning up their act, and attempting to qualify. Originally, that was the excuse that Russia declared, their "fear" of having NATO neighbors. This was a lie, and then they switched to saving Donbas, or denazification, or demilitarizing Ukraine, or the alleged "biowarfare labs," or the "nuclear labs," or any other damned excuse for their aggression. IMO, the real reason is so they can gain the seaports and control the Azov Sea. They want that corridor. They are also working to take over Georgia.

We are in a pickle. We can't show fear of Putin. We can't let him control us with fear of a nuclear war. Sure, we'd be stupid not to fear it, but we can't let Xi and Putin become the masters of the world.

NATO is already fighting WW3, we just don't recognize it. It is an incremental war, but there are tactics being used, armaments, and attempted diplomacy. The UN is defining the sides by their voting for resolutions. People are already divided there into friendly and unfriendly. People just think that because there are no boots actually on the ground in Ukraine other than people living there, they are safe, when in reality the entire world is at risk because of that one man, and one government.

There is absolutely no reason to make some rule that Putin can't be touched, or Russia can't be touched. They can be. What Putin is doing in Mariupol is the same as any concentration camp, any ghetto created. And, we are on the sidelines watching.

They always say that as soon as the conversation devolves into Hitler comparisons that it should end. But, look at the perspective. Putin is a modern day Hitler. He really is. He is carrying out the same, horrifying crap that Hitler did. And, we are doing the same things that we did last time. The US supplied Britain with military materials in WW2 before we HAD TO JOIN in the fight. When Japan breached that line, it was on. So, I hear Ukraine pleading that the line has been breached in their country. And, we are just watching, the same way we did before we had to join in WW2. It's just that we are being pulled over the line, little by little. I think that Russia is counting on both China and India to back them, push come to shove with the US and NATO.

So, IMO, it doesn't much matter whether a country is a member, a partner, or some stupid country just waiting for the outcome. We are all involved in it. Let's face it. We need to capture Putin. Why he did this, we'll never know, except that power corrupts. Whatever we think we learned about Hitler, we can apply to Putin. Never in my lifetime did I think that this would happen. You can't be friendly with someone like this. There is nothing to save here.

I'd move up the G20 summit schedule. Why are they holding it in October? I'd extend that invitation to him, and nab him there. It would not be a dirty deed. It would be saving the world.

Same thing for Lukashenko.

I probably didn't fully understand your comments. I am just truly viscerally upset over the thought of little kids starving to death because of Putin's desire to own their seaport. I know a measure of someone's character is how they treat other people during times of disaster or distress. I trust Joe Biden to do the right thing. But, almost daily my anger compels me to imagine Moscow bombed to rubble. Good thing I am not President.

And, I live on the WC of the US, and so when the missiles fly, I'll probably go in the first volley. If I don't, I'll be out there following orders. Nothing much else I can do. The only other thing I can think of is to make sure to GOTV. Having a Republican president will probably kill me, anyway.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What? Lochloosa Mar 2022 #1
What are you talking about? Ukraine is not a member of NATO. panader0 Mar 2022 #2
Partner* ColinC Mar 2022 #5
That ship has sailed. Georgia is also a NATO "partner". 11 Bravo Mar 2022 #35
And Sweden and Finland are NATO partners reconsidering their afiliation ColinC Mar 2022 #49
What NATO country got invaded? Ohio Joe Mar 2022 #3
Partner* ColinC Mar 2022 #4
ahhh... Ohio Joe Mar 2022 #9
See edit in OP ColinC Mar 2022 #41
Well... Ohio Joe Mar 2022 #44
Sure. For instance, Sweden and Finland are definitely reconsidering their position as partners ColinC Mar 2022 #45
You post an article from Feb 28, 2022 to say we are/have done NOTHING for Ukraine via NATO? REALLY? hlthe2b Mar 2022 #6
Nope. Not what I said. ColinC Mar 2022 #7
I heard something like this from RWers who still support Trump's intention to remove US from NATO. hlthe2b Mar 2022 #8
No. My stance is NATO should do more. ColinC Mar 2022 #11
"unless partnership is given more priority in its status." bluewater Mar 2022 #18
How Do We Know RobinA Mar 2022 #28
My judgement is entirely based on what is public, and nothing more ColinC Mar 2022 #29
Proving your "point" with a month-old article obamanut2012 Mar 2022 #20
Huh? The article is for reference ColinC Mar 2022 #24
With all respect, your post makes no sense. n/t RKP5637 Mar 2022 #10
Seems a very standard, boiler-plate agreement Torchlight Mar 2022 #12
NATO is a Defensive pact. Offensive operations are not allowed...nt Wounded Bear Mar 2022 #13
Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Serbia...? ColinC Mar 2022 #15
Offensive operations are not allowed obamanut2012 Mar 2022 #21
That's a Very Fine Hair You Are Attempting to Split There. ruet Mar 2022 #32
NATO has 30 members, 37 Partners... OneBlueDotS-Carolina Mar 2022 #14
...Japan ColinC Mar 2022 #16
The United States and Japan have their own mutual defense treaty. Caliman73 Mar 2022 #19
Fair point ColinC Mar 2022 #25
...And probably why Russia was so quick to leave the disputed territory ColinC Mar 2022 #31
Semantics? 11 Bravo Mar 2022 #36
Why would they reconsider their affiliation. Caliman73 Mar 2022 #17
I think "reconsider" not so much as dissolve ColinC Mar 2022 #27
You can keep repeating "partner", parnter, but bottrott Mar 2022 #22
Post removed Post removed Mar 2022 #23
"I wonder if other NATO partners (non members) are reconsidering their affiliation." LudwigPastorius Mar 2022 #26
"reconsider" does not necessarily mean consider dissolving partnership ColinC Mar 2022 #34
Maybe clarify your opening post. Torchlight Mar 2022 #37
There was no definition provided. Just people jumping to conclusions ColinC Mar 2022 #39
I see people reaching conclusions, but no jumps. Torchlight Mar 2022 #42
It was like, one sentence. ColinC Mar 2022 #43
Which directly referenced an in-depth article Torchlight Mar 2022 #46
It was one sentence... ColinC Mar 2022 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author Torchlight Mar 2022 #47
There is no treaty with Ukraine for mutual defense. SoonerPride Mar 2022 #30
Understand the difference between member and partner in NATO. LiberalFighter Mar 2022 #33
I think NATO partners are delighted at the response. Weapons, intelligence, and economic warfare? mathematic Mar 2022 #38
See my edit in the OP ColinC Mar 2022 #40
You don't say.. denbot Mar 2022 #50
No member is reconsidering their membership. EndlessWire Mar 2022 #51
You just made my point for me. ColinC Mar 2022 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If this is how NATO treat...»Reply #51