Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

bluewater

(5,376 posts)
Sat Mar 26, 2022, 02:05 PM Mar 2022

Why has the Crimean Bridge, also called the Kerch Strait Bridge, not been blown up? [View all]

The Crimean Bridge, also called the Kerch Strait Bridge, or colloquially the Kerch Bridge, is a pair of Russian-constructed parallel bridges, spanning the Strait of Kerch between the Taman Peninsula of Krasnodar Krai and the Kerch Peninsula of Crimea.[d] The bridge complex provides for both road and rail traffic, and has a length of 19 km (11.8 mi),[e] making it the longest bridge Russia has ever built,[17][f] and the longest bridge in Europe.[18][15][19]

Having been considered since at least 1903, planning for the bridge began in 2014, after the Russian annexation of Crimea. In January 2015, the multibillion-dollar contract for the construction of the bridge was awarded to Arkady Rotenberg's Stroygazmontazh. Construction of the bridge commenced in February 2016;[a] the road bridge was inaugurated by Russian President Vladimir Putin on 15 May 2018 and opened for non-truck cars on 16 May and for trucks on 1 October.[7][20] The rail bridge was inaugurated on 23 December 2019 and the first scheduled passenger train crossed the bridge on 25 December 2019. The bridge was opened for freight trains on 30 June 2020. A record traffic was recorded on 15 August 2020 and amounted to 36,393 cars.[21]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_Bridge






This bridge is the main, no - make that the ONLY, railroad and highway link connecting Russia and Crimea.

Its strategic importance in conveying troops, equipment and supplies into Crimea and then on to southern Ukraine is simply immense.

Why is it still standing?

Surely, Russian air and missile defenses can't possibly be so impenetrable that this bridge cannot be destroyed, right?!?

EDIT ADDED:
A poster down thread suggested that this bridge might be out of range of Ukrainian jets or missiles.
If that is the case, does that mean we, the US and NATO, are afraid to give Ukraine missiles that _could_ reach this vital link?

Is it the case that we are afraid to give Ukraine missiles that would allow them to strike Russia itself? Hence they only get anti-tank weapons and short range stinger anti-aircraft missiles?

That said, isn't Crimea internationally recognized as sovereign Ukrainian territory? So, at least a portion of this bridge could be attacked since it indeed inside Ukraine, right?







66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Because the Russians consider it Russian Territory Abnredleg Mar 2022 #1
Why hasn't Ukraine destroyed it? bluewater Mar 2022 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #10
We're not talking about NATO destroying but Ukrainians who are already firing into Russia uponit7771 Mar 2022 #12
It has been surprising that more bridges have not been blown and roads cratered dutch777 Mar 2022 #2
Far from Ukrainian forces relayerbob Mar 2022 #3
"Ukraine has no missiles capable of reaching it" Are we afraid of giving Ukraine missiles that could bluewater Mar 2022 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #14
Okay, that's enough. Iggo Mar 2022 #65
Ukraine hit Rostov with a ballistic missile in the early hours of this war. Swede Mar 2022 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #16
"Plus there are water pipelines on that bridge that feed russian troops in Crimea." bluewater Mar 2022 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #25
OH! I misread what you wrote. Sorry! bluewater Mar 2022 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #29
Would it also cut off the water supply to the civilian population? nt. Mariana Mar 2022 #66
Also when this happened it was pointed out that Rostov has a nuclear reactor. Swede Mar 2022 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #26
Honestly, I can't see any reason not to cut this vital supply link. bluewater Mar 2022 #19
I'm sure that has never crossed anyone else's mind. relayerbob Mar 2022 #39
So attacking the Crimean Bridge would be considered an escalation by Russia? bluewater Mar 2022 #50
See my other response to you, in another sub-thread relayerbob Mar 2022 #53
Your insistence that NATO can't train Ukrainians sufficiently is noted. bluewater Mar 2022 #55
It takes several months, assuming we had a suitable weapon system relayerbob Mar 2022 #57
Millerevo, not Rostov relayerbob Mar 2022 #40
Give the Ukrainians a couple of short-range missiles dalton99a Mar 2022 #6
Ukrainians are not fighting outside of Ukraine. Sneederbunk Mar 2022 #7
CRIMEA is an integral part of Ukraine. bluewater Mar 2022 #13
Not since 2014. Sneederbunk Mar 2022 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #21
Exactly. bluewater Mar 2022 #24
Ukraine doesn't recognize that. NutmegYankee Mar 2022 #27
The OP is talking about logistics. The bridge should be blown to prevent Russia Quixote1818 Mar 2022 #31
If that is the case, Ukraine should be fighting in Crimea too. Sneederbunk Mar 2022 #32
Indeed. I think Ukraine plans to, actually. bluewater Mar 2022 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #35
They have to get there first relayerbob Mar 2022 #41
Crimea is Ukrainian terroritory not Russian uponit7771 Mar 2022 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #18
Yes, it could be destroyed at any time. MineralMan Mar 2022 #8
"That it has not is part of strategic planning" oh, please, that's sophistry. bluewater Mar 2022 #11
And yet the bridge still stands. MineralMan Mar 2022 #30
Inexplicably so. bluewater Mar 2022 #33
No. Not inexplicable. MineralMan Mar 2022 #36
My snarky reply reconsidered and removed. bluewater Mar 2022 #37
No, it can't be "destroyed at any time" relayerbob Mar 2022 #43
Excellent points. bluewater Mar 2022 #44
That bridge has always been beyond the range of the missile mentioned above muriel_volestrangler Mar 2022 #38
Why hasn't Ukraine been supplied with a missile that could reach the bridge? bluewater Mar 2022 #42
Well, for starters, they wouldn't even know how to use it. relayerbob Mar 2022 #45
So, you agree the US and NATO feel Russia would view it as crossing a red-line bluewater Mar 2022 #48
Well, it certainly would cross that line, since NATO would actually have to man the missiles relayerbob Mar 2022 #52
"while minimizing the risks to Ukraine" as Ukrainian cities are reduced to rubble bluewater Mar 2022 #54
Also, Crimea is controlled entirely by Russia. relayerbob Mar 2022 #46
Yes, Crimea is totally occupied by Russia. bluewater Mar 2022 #47
You're the thread starter with the questions about hitting the bridge muriel_volestrangler Mar 2022 #49
So, basically, yes, the US and NATO are afraid it would be viewed as an escalation? OK bluewater Mar 2022 #51
A very graceful end to dumbcat Mar 2022 #56
Thanks. It's a complicated issue that deserves civil discourse. bluewater Mar 2022 #58
Likely because no one but you has decided iemanja Mar 2022 #59
No, I assumed that Ukraine would want to sever a major Russian supply link bluewater Mar 2022 #60
How is it iemanja Mar 2022 #61
How are things going? bluewater Mar 2022 #62
Is there some reason you can't answer a question? iemanja Mar 2022 #63
Because Ukraine does not need the rallying cry of its destruction in Russia. roamer65 Mar 2022 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why has the Crimean Bridg...