Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why has the Crimean Bridge, also called the Kerch Strait Bridge, not been blown up? [View all]
The Crimean Bridge, also called the Kerch Strait Bridge, or colloquially the Kerch Bridge, is a pair of Russian-constructed parallel bridges, spanning the Strait of Kerch between the Taman Peninsula of Krasnodar Krai and the Kerch Peninsula of Crimea.[d] The bridge complex provides for both road and rail traffic, and has a length of 19 km (11.8 mi),[e] making it the longest bridge Russia has ever built,[17][f] and the longest bridge in Europe.[18][15][19]
Having been considered since at least 1903, planning for the bridge began in 2014, after the Russian annexation of Crimea. In January 2015, the multibillion-dollar contract for the construction of the bridge was awarded to Arkady Rotenberg's Stroygazmontazh. Construction of the bridge commenced in February 2016;[a] the road bridge was inaugurated by Russian President Vladimir Putin on 15 May 2018 and opened for non-truck cars on 16 May and for trucks on 1 October.[7][20] The rail bridge was inaugurated on 23 December 2019 and the first scheduled passenger train crossed the bridge on 25 December 2019. The bridge was opened for freight trains on 30 June 2020. A record traffic was recorded on 15 August 2020 and amounted to 36,393 cars.[21]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_Bridge
Having been considered since at least 1903, planning for the bridge began in 2014, after the Russian annexation of Crimea. In January 2015, the multibillion-dollar contract for the construction of the bridge was awarded to Arkady Rotenberg's Stroygazmontazh. Construction of the bridge commenced in February 2016;[a] the road bridge was inaugurated by Russian President Vladimir Putin on 15 May 2018 and opened for non-truck cars on 16 May and for trucks on 1 October.[7][20] The rail bridge was inaugurated on 23 December 2019 and the first scheduled passenger train crossed the bridge on 25 December 2019. The bridge was opened for freight trains on 30 June 2020. A record traffic was recorded on 15 August 2020 and amounted to 36,393 cars.[21]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_Bridge
This bridge is the main, no - make that the ONLY, railroad and highway link connecting Russia and Crimea.
Its strategic importance in conveying troops, equipment and supplies into Crimea and then on to southern Ukraine is simply immense.
Why is it still standing?
Surely, Russian air and missile defenses can't possibly be so impenetrable that this bridge cannot be destroyed, right?!?
EDIT ADDED:
A poster down thread suggested that this bridge might be out of range of Ukrainian jets or missiles.
If that is the case, does that mean we, the US and NATO, are afraid to give Ukraine missiles that _could_ reach this vital link?
Is it the case that we are afraid to give Ukraine missiles that would allow them to strike Russia itself? Hence they only get anti-tank weapons and short range stinger anti-aircraft missiles?
That said, isn't Crimea internationally recognized as sovereign Ukrainian territory? So, at least a portion of this bridge could be attacked since it indeed inside Ukraine, right?
A poster down thread suggested that this bridge might be out of range of Ukrainian jets or missiles.
If that is the case, does that mean we, the US and NATO, are afraid to give Ukraine missiles that _could_ reach this vital link?
Is it the case that we are afraid to give Ukraine missiles that would allow them to strike Russia itself? Hence they only get anti-tank weapons and short range stinger anti-aircraft missiles?
That said, isn't Crimea internationally recognized as sovereign Ukrainian territory? So, at least a portion of this bridge could be attacked since it indeed inside Ukraine, right?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
66 replies, 3176 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why has the Crimean Bridge, also called the Kerch Strait Bridge, not been blown up? [View all]
bluewater
Mar 2022
OP
We're not talking about NATO destroying but Ukrainians who are already firing into Russia
uponit7771
Mar 2022
#12
It has been surprising that more bridges have not been blown and roads cratered
dutch777
Mar 2022
#2
"Ukraine has no missiles capable of reaching it" Are we afraid of giving Ukraine missiles that could
bluewater
Mar 2022
#5
"Plus there are water pipelines on that bridge that feed russian troops in Crimea."
bluewater
Mar 2022
#22
The OP is talking about logistics. The bridge should be blown to prevent Russia
Quixote1818
Mar 2022
#31
"That it has not is part of strategic planning" oh, please, that's sophistry.
bluewater
Mar 2022
#11
That bridge has always been beyond the range of the missile mentioned above
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2022
#38
So, you agree the US and NATO feel Russia would view it as crossing a red-line
bluewater
Mar 2022
#48
Well, it certainly would cross that line, since NATO would actually have to man the missiles
relayerbob
Mar 2022
#52
"while minimizing the risks to Ukraine" as Ukrainian cities are reduced to rubble
bluewater
Mar 2022
#54
You're the thread starter with the questions about hitting the bridge
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2022
#49
So, basically, yes, the US and NATO are afraid it would be viewed as an escalation? OK
bluewater
Mar 2022
#51