Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grasswire2

(13,849 posts)
8. See the comprehensive post from DU's Celerity several weeks ago.
Sat Mar 26, 2022, 05:16 PM
Mar 2022

anti-privacy

actively fought student loan reforms as a lobbyist

was a lobbyist for Big Pharma and helped weaken opioid drug oversight enforcement

Jared-Ivanka “Ethics” Lawyer Helped Pharma Weaken Opioid Enforcement

https://www.republicreport.org/2017/jared-ivanka-ethics-lawyer-helped-pharma-weaken-opioid-enforcement/




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamie_Gorelick

Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)

Even though she had no previous training nor experience in finance, Gorelick was appointed Vice Chairman of Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) from 1997 to 2003. She served alongside former Clinton Administration official Franklin Raines. During that period, Fannie Mae developed a $10 billion accounting scandal.

On March 25, 2002, Business Week interviewed Gorelick about the health of Fannie Mae. Gorelick is quoted as saying, "We believe we are managed safely. We are very pleased that Moody's gave us an A-minus in the area of bank financial strength – without a reference to the government in any way. Fannie Mae is among the handful of top-quality institutions." One year later, government regulators accused Fannie Mae of improper accounting "to the tune of $9 billion" in unrecorded losses.

In an additional scandal concerning falsified financial transactions that helped the company meet earnings targets for 1998, a "manipulation" that triggered multimillion-dollar bonuses for top executives, Gorelick received $779,625.

A 2006 report of an investigation by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight into Fannie Mae's accounting practices and corporate governance revealed that from 1998 to 2002 Gorelick received a total of $26.5 million in income from Fannie Mae.


9/11 Commission

According to Gorelick's op-ed letter in the Washington Post she states that: "At last week's hearing, Attorney General John Ashcroft, facing criticism, asserted that 'the single greatest structural cause for September 11 was the wall that segregated criminal investigators and intelligence agents' and that I built that wall through a March 1995 memo." However, the report from the 9/11 Commission, co-authored by Gorelick, asserts that the 'wall' limiting the ability of federal agencies to cooperate had existed since the 1980s and is in fact not one singular wall but a series of restrictions created over the course of over twenty years.

Conflict of interest

A 1995 Department of Justice memorandum states that the procedures her memorandum put in place for the investigation of the 1993 WTC bombing "go beyond what is legally required...[to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation." The wall intentionally exceeded the requirements of FISA (the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978) for the purposes of criminal investigations, as well as the then-existing federal case law. These rules were, shortly after their creation, expanded to regulate such communications in future counter-terrorism investigations.

Gorelick eventually recused herself from reviewing her own role in the regulation of information about terrorist activities.


Lawyer for Duke University

Gorelick was added in February 2006 to Duke University's defense team after the 2006 Duke University lacrosse case scandal. The University faced claims by unaccused members of the team that they "railroaded 47 Duke University students as either principals or accomplices." Gorelick and her law firm left the defense team in July 2011 after Judge Beatty denied Duke's motions to dismiss and let the lawsuits proceed in April.



Jamie Gorelick: Amazon's Anti-Union Shadow Adviser At The DOJ

https://therevolvingdoorproject.org/jamie-gorelick-amazons-anti-union-shadow-adviser-at-the-doj/


Ivanka and Jared’s Ethics Lawyer Somehow Wins Ethics Award

https://www.republicreport.org/2017/ivanka-jareds-ethics-lawyer-somehow-wins-ethics-award/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What's wrong with that? Ocelot II Mar 2022 #1
To provide some context, for those who Jamie Gorelick is not a household name: NBachers Mar 2022 #2
Lawyer for Jared Kuschner? Poiuyt Mar 2022 #4
yes, she is/was Kushner's ETHICS ATTORNEY. nt Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #5
that bio leaves out a lot of information about Gorelick Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #6
You are welcome to provide the information in your original post. NBachers Mar 2022 #7
It's a shame Mr.Bill Mar 2022 #3
+1! 2naSalit Mar 2022 #17
See the comprehensive post from DU's Celerity several weeks ago. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #8
a couple more links Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #10
I can't even begin to imagine what's next. nt Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #14
She is a Democrat obamanut2012 Mar 2022 #18
Source? DET Mar 2022 #11
still waiting for a link. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #12
if true, there's a reason they hired her... agingdem Mar 2022 #13
She is a well-known Democrat and has served the Dems well obamanut2012 Mar 2022 #15
I thought she was just consulted, along with others, to find Bev54 Mar 2022 #16
You are correct obamanut2012 Mar 2022 #19
So far, I'm seeing that the committee hired her to provide advice on the writing of the document. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #20
But why would they involve her in ANY WAY... Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #21
Because she is a well-known DEMocratic attorney, who served as Assistant AG for Clinton? obamanut2012 Mar 2022 #22
Why are you replying to yourself? obamanut2012 Mar 2022 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm just seeing that Jami...»Reply #8