Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)
6. Not really
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 12:07 PM
Mar 2022

She has no direct interest in the outcome. Sure, she has strong feelings on the case, but so do millions of other Americans. But she doesn't stand to lose or gain anything directly from the outcome.

When the recent story broke and there were reports that her communications were included in the request before the court and I started to think that maybe there was something there. But those reports turned out to be false, the committee already had those records.

You will need direct involvement by Ginny to even try to build an impeachment case on Clarence and even then, it's a weak case without something criminal on both of them. Until then, we don't have the votes in the House to start anything and we will never have the votes in the Senate short of irrefutable evidence of a felony.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

'Impeachment Material': Ginni's Jan. 6 texts [View all] struggle4progress Mar 2022 OP
The committee already had her communications Zeitghost Mar 2022 #1
not aware of that ... stopdiggin Mar 2022 #3
If she's actively involved with people closely involved in the case, it matters struggle4progress Mar 2022 #5
Not really Zeitghost Mar 2022 #6
The Senate GOP JustAnotherGen Mar 2022 #2
And the House won 't vote to impeach Zeitghost Mar 2022 #4
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Impeachment Material': G...»Reply #6