Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
28. So you only want successful candidates at the outset?
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 07:59 PM
Mar 2022

Washington is one of the most expensive media markets. You're requiring a candidate to already have a war chest.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

South Carolina has more or less indicated who our last three nominees have been. BlueCheeseAgain Mar 2022 #1
In the past 60 years South Carolina has voted for the Democratic candidate only twice. jalan48 Mar 2022 #2
So what? Iowa never votes for us. Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #12
Why not Georgia? It has more black voters and, we have a chance to win there. jalan48 Mar 2022 #13
Georgia was one of my suggestions. Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #17
And GA gave us control of the Senate question everything Mar 2022 #20
You would have to raise and spend a lot for Georgia Buckeyeblue Mar 2022 #23
Nevada works for me, plus it's a state we can win, unlike SC. jalan48 Mar 2022 #24
why should a small state have such a large effect on our choice...I think larger states should Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #33
Iowa voted for Obama twice question everything Mar 2022 #21
True, but Iowa has changed...and was never diverse enough to be first...they had way to much Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #34
Why not a state That might actually vote for a democrat? questionseverything Mar 2022 #3
Like New Hampshire? brooklynite Mar 2022 #5
Like a state we really need and have a decent chance with questionseverything Mar 2022 #8
There are Black voters in Southern states (and in other areas too) who elect house members Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #10
New Hampshire is a small state with few electoral college votes...if you really want to pick Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #11
NV, AZ, NC, VA, GA, WI, NH, CO (in no particular order) ALL are vital swing states, none are Celerity Mar 2022 #14
I vote down 'quirky' New Hampshire...it is not diverse and has very few electoral votes...what is Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #18
It would do no harm going 6th, 7th, or 8th. That said, their state law that Celerity Mar 2022 #19
I'd like give Jim a call,... JoeOtterbein Mar 2022 #4
Sadly this was a face to face chat. brooklynite Mar 2022 #6
Darn! AND... JoeOtterbein Mar 2022 #7
I agree, but I expect no primary should Biden decide to run...we lose always when that happens. Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #9
Unlike the Republicans we don't hold a Primary process to protect the incumbent brooklynite Mar 2022 #15
I completely disagree...who did President Obama run against in his second term...refresh my Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #16
Not the point... brooklynite Mar 2022 #22
It is exactly the point. It was understood that no one should run against Pres. Obama and Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #25
Why then is the DNC spending extensive time restructuring the nominating practice? brooklynite Mar 2022 #27
Well, what if for some reason Biden was not able to run...then we would need a primary. Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #30
And neither of them had a primary opponent now did they? And both won the General...let's Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #32
SC is one of the most anti gay states in the nation dsc Mar 2022 #26
So you only want successful candidates at the outset? brooklynite Mar 2022 #28
Charlotte isn't cheap and neither is Atlanta both of which are needed for SC dsc Mar 2022 #29
Why do people insist on starting with absolutely safe Democratic States? brooklynite Mar 2022 #31
I am not wedded to a Democratic state dsc Mar 2022 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, I was discussing the ...»Reply #28