Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Claire McCaskill and Frank Figliusi don't snicker, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #1
I think it's time for some senior Dems to muse that Garland should consider his position. OnDoutside Mar 2022 #5
If Garland is not investigating this then Biden will lose. People elected dem4decades Mar 2022 #11
You are correct. They Rebl2 Mar 2022 #52
He's a disappointment all right. He only got the job because... brush Mar 2022 #2
I have to post this. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #3
This is what I feared iemanja Mar 2022 #4
and it tells me the rules simply do not apply to them, but they do to me... Eliot Rosewater Mar 2022 #8
Like George Carlin said, "There's a big fuckin' club and we ain't in it." Magoo48 Mar 2022 #18
It empowers more than Trump..It empowers Lawlessness whathehell Mar 2022 #15
Someone pointed that out to me, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #7
Say it ain't so Joe.. whathehell Mar 2022 #9
I support Biden in moving on. Smart move and philosophy, but Democrats Hoyt Mar 2022 #12
article is from 2019 and not close to relevant uponit7771 Mar 2022 #14
Find it perfectly relevant. Hope we move on before midterms. Hoyt Mar 2022 #16
Attacking democracy isn't something to be "moved on" from. uponit7771 Mar 2022 #17
Sorry, I disagree. But spend the next 20 years letting it eat you up. Hoyt Mar 2022 #21
Americans believe attacks on our democracy are real issues uponit7771 Mar 2022 #23
He's not irrelevant. He's still inciting violence Marius25 Mar 2022 #31
But he's not getting anywhere with his crud. Hoyt Mar 2022 #38
No other issues matter if Trump and his supporters get away with sedition. Marius25 Mar 2022 #32
Sorry, I disagree. He's a loser and his Magetts are too. But hey, Hoyt Mar 2022 #37
No we don't. Because we're likely to lose Midterms, Marius25 Mar 2022 #41
And maybe focusing on punishing previous admin will spur loses. Hoyt Mar 2022 #51
Then they're idiots. American Democracy will not survive Marius25 Mar 2022 #56
Yeah, trying to stop people from facing voters just doesn't sound like Hoyt Mar 2022 #58
+100 nt reACTIONary Mar 2022 #60
They're insurrectionists. The Constitution doesn't allow them to run. Marius25 Mar 2022 #62
Gotta convict them first, and it will be 2024 before they would Hoyt Mar 2022 #63
That's unlikely to happen with Biden's approval rating Marius25 Mar 2022 #65
Definitely agree on Greene. That district went 80% for trump. But Hoyt Mar 2022 #70
Talk about soft on crime! Holy Shit! Lucky Luciano Mar 2022 #64
You are going to be disappointed, especially when we lose midterms Hoyt Mar 2022 #67
We're going to lose the midterms most likely either way, so we'd better act fast. Lucky Luciano Mar 2022 #72
People get dejected about politics because of all BS too. I prefer Dem's stuff to GOPer, but still. Hoyt Mar 2022 #81
I was like you with bush, but learned my lesson. It's easier to move on and stop eating Hoyt Mar 2022 #82
+1000. Exactly. WTF? nt ecstatic Mar 2022 #49
Great post. Boydog Mar 2022 #74
the article is from November 2020. He was president elect. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #29
not true, stop saying that! Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #78
Yeah. We turn on people who side with the criminals Marius25 Mar 2022 #30
Jailing trump, which I don't think is even possible, ain't supporting democracy. Hoyt Mar 2022 #39
Why wouldn't it be possible? Marius25 Mar 2022 #42
Because the jury won't think like you and me. Hoyt Mar 2022 #48
Probably because you need evidence in a court of law... reACTIONary Mar 2022 #59
There has been tons of evidence that would stand up in court. Marius25 Mar 2022 #61
Good point, and the sate of Georgia is looking into it... reACTIONary Mar 2022 #71
The Jury pool actually would include DUers in a federal case. Marius25 Mar 2022 #75
Nope. First question a potential jurer would be asked is... reACTIONary Mar 2022 #76
It's impossible to find a jury in DC that has never read the news. Marius25 Mar 2022 #77
Maybe.. But they will not have been reading DU... reACTIONary Mar 2022 #80
Article is from 2019, after J6 things ***NO DOUBT*** changed uponit7771 Mar 2022 #13
article is from November 2020. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #27
Same as Obama philosophy towrd Deminpenn Mar 2022 #33
Obama was smart too. He, like Biden, represents everyone. Hoyt Mar 2022 #53
"Look forward, not back"... Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #68
Well, if that was the Biden approach - he should have told us his views. Dan Mar 2022 #40
If true, that means Biden lied to us ecstatic Mar 2022 #57
I wouldn't say he lied to us. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #79
Most of the posters here have no idea what they're talking about Trumpdumper Mar 2022 #10
and you do? whathehell Mar 2022 #19
All I said was that there's no evidence he isn't being pursued. Trumpdumper Mar 2022 #34
That's not all you said..You accused people on the thread whathehell Mar 2022 #36
I stand by the comment -- Trumpdumper Mar 2022 #44
What part of "You can't prove a negative" do you not understand? whathehell Mar 2022 #47
Let's pretend it's June 2024 and still the needle hasn't moved. Lucky Luciano Mar 2022 #69
No, there's not a scintillating of evidence that DOJ is PURSUING Trump. dem4decades Mar 2022 #20
"There should be many." Trumpdumper Mar 2022 #35
I'm so tired of that rational, not all leaks come from prosecutors, defendants and their lawyers dem4decades Mar 2022 #54
Thank you!!! MustBeTheBooz Mar 2022 #45
We have heard something, the investigation that put Cohen in Federal prison closed down. Trump dem4decades Mar 2022 #55
Right!? MustBeTheBooz Mar 2022 #66
A lot of people have EMOTIONAL INVESTMENTS in the coup. They want to see Justice at work. Eyeball_Kid Mar 2022 #26
I'd need to see the video link to decide if there was really "snickering" going on. gulliver Mar 2022 #22
I heard what sounded like laughter, whathehell Mar 2022 #25
Snickering or smiling as if to say Boydog Mar 2022 #73
As used to be said at my former company. gibraltar72 Mar 2022 #24
Shhhhhhhhh!!!! BlueIdaho Mar 2022 #28
Discouraging, isn't it! calimary Mar 2022 #43
My thinking on the subject of TFG Mr. Evil Mar 2022 #46
They weren't snickering Rebl2 Mar 2022 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nichole Wallace Panel sni...»Reply #81