General Discussion

Emile

(41,498 posts)

76. You can call out concerned posters as being divisive, but ignore a simple question.

Reply to CrackityJones75 (Reply #75)

Wed Mar 30, 2022, 07:56 AM

Mar 2022

Yes maybe we should just close our eyes and forget.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

82 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Garland apologists [View all] Boydog Mar 2022 OP

Until something unquestionably damning is found, support Garland, Biden, Hoyt Mar 2022 #1

Pshaw! slightlv Mar 2022 #2

I'll still trust Biden. Hoyt Mar 2022 #3

So will I - when he gets an Attorney General. dchill Mar 2022 #5

Thank you. Garland's inaction will be Biden's downfall. When the base isn't energized, elections dem4decades Mar 2022 #6

I worry with you slightlv Mar 2022 #15

We're die hard here. We vote all the time but there's others we need that dem4decades Mar 2022 #67

The Democratic base is COMMITTED to our principles and votes reliably. Hortensis Apr 2022 #82

A base that needs to be energized in order to elect Democrats instead of Republican traitors isn't Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #20

I take it slightlv Mar 2022 #26

+1 betsuni Mar 2022 #35

The base is made up of people who can energies themselves Kaleva Mar 2022 #27

+1 betsuni Mar 2022 #32

The "base" helped get trump elected when they weren't energized enough to vote in 2016 Hoyt Mar 2022 #40

The base does not fail to vote over one issue of many treestar Mar 2022 #45

+1000 smirkymonkey Mar 2022 #65

I admire your opinion but when you say "I trust...". Or Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2022 #14

I'll trust Biden more than a bunch of people typing in little white boxes, including me. Hoyt Mar 2022 #42

I agree. But IMHO, he already knows that for whatever Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2022 #60

Honestly, and I'll be bashed, but think a lot of poor polls is we're spending too much time going Hoyt Mar 2022 #61

So, you think he, his enablers, and co conspirators Bettie Mar 2022 #63

He's not getting a pass. And if investigation causes us to lose House, he wins. Hoyt Mar 2022 #64

I think you are right. If it's taking too long for us... Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2022 #78

That's fine, so do I with Biden BradAllison Mar 2022 #53

I think Bragg has done worse than Jack shit, if I'm up to date on his decision to shut down msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #72

That is such an accurate description "consolation prize" Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2022 #79

Trump could shoot someone on 5th avenue SpankMe Mar 2022 #12

Yippers. Thats what he said.. slightlv Mar 2022 #28

I laughed when he said that, looks like the joke is on me! Emile Mar 2022 #77

What do you attribute that to? I mean very good men Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2022 #13

No. The actual "guts" it's taking is in 1st clearing the rot from the DOJ, FBI Budi Mar 2022 #18

I remember how well they insulated reagan for Iran-Contra. Proving guilt was harder than L. Coyote Mar 2022 #17

Right... slightlv Mar 2022 #30

Biden and Garland I get, but hell no to Bragg. You are sullying the first Celerity Mar 2022 #23

Since you are apparently imminiently knowledgable about Bragg's Department, did he ever find Hoyt Mar 2022 #43

The main (ex) prosecutors from the case disagree, & they ARE eminently (imminently is the wrong word Celerity Mar 2022 #47

Pomerantz was relatively low level - new hire for trump investigation - not head of the DA's office. Hoyt Mar 2022 #49

sorry, not playing into your spin and non sequitur games Celerity Mar 2022 #51

He was like Mueller, guy with nothing to do looking for one last big payday before moving to Florida Hoyt Mar 2022 #52

LOL, ridiculous. Which is it? First you said (falsely) he was some low level nobody, NOW you are Celerity Mar 2022 #54

He's 70 years old Celerity. Christ, it's not like he's trying to advance his career. Hoyt Mar 2022 #55

Oh, now we have the ageist card played, with the added bonus of repeatedly questioning his motives Celerity Mar 2022 #56

You queston Bragg's integrity. Sigh Hoyt Mar 2022 #57

Ex-Prosecutor suspects DOJ isn't working with Congress because they are 'compromised' TheBlackAdder Mar 2022 #4

What are the chances Jeffery Clarke was the only Trumper at DOJ? dem4decades Mar 2022 #7

+1, uponit7771 Mar 2022 #16

Absolutely. Here's a good dive into the Trump/Barr corruption of that Dept. Budi Mar 2022 #19

+1 Kaleva Mar 2022 #25

Thanks. And btw, It took Tom Perez and Eric Holder several years to undo the damage W did to .... Budi Mar 2022 #29

As tired and panic-y some of us feel slightlv Mar 2022 #31

He was a lousy choice for the Supreme Court Colgate 64 Mar 2022 #8

Well Mitch would certainly agree with that!! Budi Mar 2022 #24

I'm convinced Mitch slightlv Mar 2022 #33

I'm more curious about who wants AG Garland removed. Budi Mar 2022 #9

I don't have any particular problem stopdiggin Mar 2022 #10

Since you view AG's conduct (or really, the lack of public information about his conduct) as neglect Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #11

K & R . See my post #19 above & the Read I linked to. Budi Mar 2022 #22

I have no idea what may or may not be going on at the DOJ, and I'm not even going to try to guess. ShazzieB Mar 2022 #21

What does "the Garland apologists" mean? betsuni Mar 2022 #34

I am gradually coming to the conclusion... kentuck Mar 2022 #36

PATIENCE Emile Mar 2022 #37

I'm still hoping maybe Garland will time it right to make maximum R damage for the midterms dsp3000 Mar 2022 #38

How about a little information from you about how you know enough to MineralMan Mar 2022 #39

There used to be loads of people defending Boydog Mar 2022 #44

"It almost seems..." You don't know any facts, just as I said. MineralMan Mar 2022 #48

People are growing increasingly more Boydog Mar 2022 #50

Garland is not "oblivious." He knows people are impatient. MineralMan Mar 2022 #58

Of course, we know what's going on. It's all over the news... lame54 Mar 2022 #81

The Garland Haters are no better informed than anyone else Trumpdumper Mar 2022 #41

You are calling out DUers treestar Mar 2022 #46

I'm not an apologist xmas74 Mar 2022 #59

I'm thinking some of you would totally be down to indict Trump... Scar Tissue Mar 2022 #62

I agree with that. However, not sure that's best way to introduce yourself here. Good luck. Hoyt Mar 2022 #66

This post is divisive and out of bounds. CrackityJones75 Mar 2022 #68

It seems the peoples patience has ran out! Emile Mar 2022 #69

I would agree until I saw J6 congressional leaders calling on the DOJ to do something. uponit7771 Mar 2022 #70

Yes. The Jan 6 committee Boydog Mar 2022 #71

So being a divisive instigator on this forum helps? CrackityJones75 Mar 2022 #73

Do you think the J6 congressional leaders are being divisive too? Emile Mar 2022 #74

Oh forget it CrackityJones75 Mar 2022 #75

You can call out concerned posters as being divisive, but ignore a simple question. Emile Mar 2022 #76

Cogent argument.................for pessimists Shellback Squid Mar 2022 #80