Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gingrich on ABC: 'GET OVER IT' Mourdock’s Rape Comments Are What ‘Virtually Every Catholic’ Believes [View all]msanthrope
(37,549 posts)43. Using the 'no true Scotsman' on Augustine? The guy who defined "Original Sin" for Christianity?
Last edited Sun Oct 28, 2012, 08:19 PM - Edit history (1)
The concept of Original Sin as defined by Augustine, which includes Canon 3a, cited above, is considered infallible. The infallibility of that canon (XVI Council of Carthage in 418,) was reaffirmed at the Council of Lyons II in 1274, the Council of Florence in 1438-1445 and at the Council of Trent in 1545-1555. You are required to accept the teachings on Original Sin obsequium religiosum.
You have conflated 'infallibility' with 'ex cathedra.' They are NOT the same thing. Infallible dogma can come from the pope "ex cathedra," but that is NOT the only source. There are 21 ecumenical councils you seem to want to forget.
Who can issue infallible dogma and what is infallible dogma is clarified for you in JPII's Ad tuendam fidem (and Lumen Gentium 25). You have THREE sources of infallibility within the Magisterium:
The Extrodinary Papal Magisterium (this would be 'ex cathedra' example)
The Extrodinary Episcopal Magisterium. (Councils and the like.)
The Ordinary Episcopal Magisterium speaking universally.
What is infallible dogma is a very long list, per Ratzinger*** himself:
To the truths of the first paragraph belong the articles of faith of the Creed, the various Christological dogmas21 and Marian dogmas;22 the doctrine of the institution of the sacraments by Christ and their efficacy with regard to grace;23 the doctrine of the real and substantial presence of Christ in the Eucharist24 and the sacrificial nature of the eucharistic celebration;25 the foundation of the Church by the will of Christ;26 the doctrine on the primacy and infallibility of the Roman Pontiff;27 the doctrine on the existence of original sin;28 the doctrine on the immortality of the spiritual soul and on the immediate recompense after death;29 the absence of error in the inspired sacred texts;30 the doctrine on the grave immorality of direct and voluntary killing of an innocent human being.31
http://www.ewtn.com/library/curia/cdfadtu.htm
http://www.ewtn.com/library/curia/cdfadtu.htm
The term "ex cathedra" refers to The Magisterium when the pope is acting alone. That's only happened two times--1854 (Immaculate Conception), and 1950(Assumption). MOST articles of infallible dogma, such as those listed above, come from The Magisterium through the form of Bishop's Councils. There's been 21 of 'em--that's where you get most of your dogma, and that dogma is INFALLIBLE.
Now, pnwmom, calling me an "outsider" is true---I am an atheist. But Jesuit-taught theology and Latin don't leave you. So anytime you want to play apologetics with me, I'll be happy to quote you chapter and verse of your own church's dogma to you.
***Note that Ratzinger was the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, and published commentary included in the JPII letter. I really think all Catholics would do well to read papal letters. It might surprise them.
On edit--are you really using Wikipedia to talk about Catholic dogma??? Pastor Aeternus doesn't dispute the infallibility of doctrine coming from ecumenical councils, so I'm not even sure why you are mentioning it. Why are you mentioning it????
On edit again---I just realized something from your posts. Did you know that your pope isn't the only source of infallible dogma???? I think you are conflating your pope and the Magisterium. They are not the same thing. I also think you were not taught that your Ecumenical councils are the main source of your infallible dogma.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gingrich on ABC: 'GET OVER IT' Mourdock’s Rape Comments Are What ‘Virtually Every Catholic’ Believes [View all]
trailmonkee
Oct 2012
OP
Scratch the surface of Martin Luther's theology and you'll also find a strong
coalition_unwilling
Oct 2012
#23
It is a Catholic belief. You believe everyone is born with Original Sin, right?
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#13
Is Original Sin predestined on everyone? Then guess what? Predestination is a tenet of Roman
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#26
"Born with a fallen human nature and tainted by original sin." Your church doesn't agree with you.
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#35
The Church does not teach that children born without Baptism go to hell. That is absolutely wrong.
pnwmom
Oct 2012
#36
Yes, it does. Since the Council of Carthage XVI in 418. St. Augustine wrote the Canon.
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#37
I never said that baptism isn't important for Christians. But that isn't because babies
pnwmom
Oct 2012
#53
Baptism remains de fide to Catholics. And an magazine article doesn't override
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#55
A magazine article doesn't override revolting infallible dogma on Baptism. Maybe Benedict will
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#58
Jesus never used the word "Pope" in any language. And designating Peter as the "rock" of his Church
pnwmom
Oct 2012
#72
Post 38--you quote "Pastor Aeternus" extensively. It even says "Pastor Aeternus."
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#78
Um no---Pastor Aeternus grants the pope the same power as the councils, expanding the Magisterium.
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#81
Using the 'no true Scotsman' on Augustine? The guy who defined "Original Sin" for Christianity?
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#43
What? You read the action of that verb incorrectly, m'dear. You might wanna read the whole
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#50
Actually, depending on the survey, less than a quarter agree with the church's position and about
Brickbat
Oct 2012
#5
And it is not even the hierarchy's position that God meant the pregnancy to happen
pnwmom
Oct 2012
#9
The great Newt, always honest except when he speaks, believe him, his first two wives would say no.
Thinkingabout
Oct 2012
#18
I'm Catholic, I don't believe rape is God's will, or "just another method
TwilightGardener
Oct 2012
#30
Which is exactly why I want these "pro life" Neanderthals nowhere near our government.
Initech
Oct 2012
#31
That very well may be so, it may be what Catholics believe or want to believe.
liberalhistorian
Oct 2012
#44