General Discussion

Hekate

(100,133 posts)

34. This

Reply to MineralMan (Reply #12)

Thu Mar 31, 2022, 01:46 PM

Mar 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

114 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WaPo confirms Grand Jury has been convened to subpoena "officials in Trump's orbit" [View all] Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 OP

Does anybody know who got them? Walleye Mar 2022 #1

WaPo says sources declined to name witnesses subpoenaed, but seem my update from NYT Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #5

Sounds like people who rented the buses. gab13by13 Mar 2022 #33

Please tell me the fat lady is warming up for Clarence. gldstwmn Mar 2022 #83

The Fat Lady named , True Blue American Apr 2022 #110

When I first read the headline of this post Jerry2144 Mar 2022 #2

Reminds me of this joke: Ocelot II Mar 2022 #7

Yeah that is a big disappointment Evolve Dammit Mar 2022 #17

I'm often disappointed when I see headlines with the word "Trump" nt IronLionZion Apr 2022 #109

Nah, the word is already out - it's time to move the goalposts AZSkiffyGeek Mar 2022 #3

Not what it means to me, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #8

I don't get it. How were we wrong? Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #32

Because people were correct in the DOJ **NOT** subpoenaing Trumps orbit nearly a year ago uponit7771 Mar 2022 #38

You are not making this any clearer. Let's take a step back, shall we? Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #63

No, I'm not saying that. My complaints of the DOJ are in line with the J6C uponit7771 Mar 2022 #64

Then say what you are saying! Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #74

J6C issues with DOJ are clear and similar to mine uponit7771 Mar 2022 #75

So you can't list your complaints or show how similar they are to the J6C complaints. Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #79

Link inside uponit7771 Mar 2022 #80

Ok, one complaint. Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #90

maybe not Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #97

+1, uponit7771 Mar 2022 #36

You do realize that these reports could come from outside the DOJ? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #42

Did you forget the sarcasm thingy? we can do it Mar 2022 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author we can do it Mar 2022 #14

this is why it's absurd to go around calling for Garland to resign. bigtree Mar 2022 #4

Yup- someone on another thread just posted they"know for a fact" Garland has declined to prosecute Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #6

It may have been me. gab13by13 Mar 2022 #10

Not only that. Steve Canuck Mar 2022 #24

Sure they can- only a handful have refused to testify, hundreds have complied Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #43

You mean the entire inner circle of the Trump admin have refused Steve Canuck Mar 2022 #86

Just because Trump's inner circle (and only a small portion at that) refused to comply... Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #92

Many of the inner circle that has not been subpoenaed would likely ignore it. Steve Canuck Apr 2022 #104

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2022 #105

I respect Garland and want his investigations and prosecutions to succeed HariSeldon Mar 2022 #18

the Watergate timeline bigtree Mar 2022 #60

But consider also the context HariSeldon Mar 2022 #68

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2022 #106

This is key. notinkansas Apr 2022 #111

...K&R... spanone Mar 2022 #9

Kick and rec for Trump's secret pals. Kingofalldems Mar 2022 #11

So this grand jury has been working for 2 months. MineralMan Mar 2022 #12

you are entitled llashram Mar 2022 #22

A grand jury has been convened for 2 months, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #27

As far as you know... MineralMan Mar 2022 #29

This Hekate Mar 2022 #34

Yup. MineralMan Mar 2022 #35

The fact that it started two months ago is fvckin scary in and of itself. Now are people going to uponit7771 Mar 2022 #39

When was Nixon prosecuted? I don't remember. MineralMan Mar 2022 #41

Never and it still didn't take DOJ more than a year to whip up special prosecutor uponit7771 Mar 2022 #46

So, the special prosecutor didn't get Nixon prosecuted. MineralMan Mar 2022 #49

Nixon got pardoned didn't he? The SP DID take down a lot of his clown car and if Nixon ... uponit7771 Mar 2022 #51

Yes, he got a blanket pardon, even though he had never been charged MineralMan Mar 2022 #72

Hunter Biden Federal Investigation Heats Up uponit7771 Mar 2022 #73

"Why should it be a special prosecutor instead of what is now in place? Didn't work for Nixon." MerryHolidays Mar 2022 #98

For those who invoke Nixon hamsterjill Mar 2022 #55

+1, I think people are taking as much copium as they can when it comes to the DOJ. We see ... uponit7771 Mar 2022 #58

Agreed hamsterjill Mar 2022 #61

+1, looking at EVERY poll Biden's numbers are down among dems and independents and couldn't uponit7771 Mar 2022 #62

There are a lot of us on DU who feel this way hamsterjill Mar 2022 #65

Some people are upset. fightforfreedom Mar 2022 #45

Yes, exactly. MineralMan Mar 2022 #50

You mean like the J6 committee?! They're not happy with DOJ either uponit7771 Mar 2022 #52

As distractions go, this is a good one. Sneederbunk Mar 2022 #15

Who is it distracting, and what are they distracted from? Torchlight Mar 2022 #23

trump and his 'advisor'-daughter llashram Mar 2022 #16

That deposition is not a DOJ thing. MineralMan Mar 2022 #19

yeah you are correct llashram Mar 2022 #20

The Trumps have appealed the order. MineralMan Mar 2022 #21

Will this satisfy the DU naysayers that the DOJ has been going after the proverbial "big fish" for Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #25

Can't answer that unless you give us some names. gab13by13 Mar 2022 #28

The report says people in the "VIP group" at the rally have been subpoenaed Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #44

I doubt it. They're heavily invested in the DOJ is not doing anything idea. MineralMan Mar 2022 #30

No and it shouldn't, people are thinking they DOJ started GJ last year & to find it they started uponit7771 Mar 2022 #53

Who are the "people" you are speaking of? Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #69

Members of the J6C? tia uponit7771 Mar 2022 #70

Members of the J6 Committee are thinking that the DOJ started the Grand Jury last year? Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #76

J6C complaints of DOJ in link uponit7771 Mar 2022 #78

That's an awfully long article with precious few "complaints" Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #88

Do you realize the "complaints" from the J6C are from the day *before* these GJ reports? Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #100

It doesn't satisfy me. hamsterjill Mar 2022 #66

So the goal post has moved again. Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #71

The only big fish that I care about is Trump. hamsterjill Mar 2022 #77

That'll make em skeeered Traildogbob Mar 2022 #26

You can't ignore a grand jury subpoena without immediate consequences Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #47

True, they'll just bullshit their way with suites and appeals hearing of why Trumps toenails ... uponit7771 Mar 2022 #54

That's great to know Traildogbob Mar 2022 #57

But if we have a slew of them defying subpoenas and not showing up calimary Mar 2022 #31

For the bajillionth time Grand Jury subpoenas are different than congressional ones Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #48

some progress ... BlueWavePsych Mar 2022 #37

I hope you're right that you can't ignore a grand jury subpoena without swift consequences wryter2000 Mar 2022 #40

They wont "ignore" it just sue for stupid shit that wont get readily nixed by a judge like they uponit7771 Mar 2022 #59

GJ jury subpoenas are much harder to successfully challenge, especially for testimony Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #84

thx uponit7771 Apr 2022 #103

'Recreational complainers... have been wrong' ?!?! Well then, I'm proud to be tossed into the TeamProg Mar 2022 #56

+1, uponit7771 Mar 2022 #67

Schiff and Kirchner's mild expressions of concern can't compare to the DU'ers wanting AG's head Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #82

Mild? Hardly! They seemed quite pissed off about the lack of progress. Esp. Kirschner and HE'S A TeamProg Mar 2022 #85

I've watched numerous Kirchner videos Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #94

Here's Kirchner's take today on these reports: Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #99

Things seem to continue to go in the right direction. SmallFry Mar 2022 #81

"DOJ slow to resolve Trump-era legal battles " TeamProg Mar 2022 #87

The Hill? Seriously? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #95

Jan. 6 Committee Sends Message to AG Merrick Garland: 'Do Your Job'" TeamProg Mar 2022 #89

Any more RW "Dems in Disarray" stories you'd like to share? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #96

"Complaints" are From the day *before* the Grand Jury's existence was revealed. Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #101

Sounds like Dolt 45 fits the description -- DeeDeeNY Mar 2022 #91

Ari Melber had on Caroline Wren who with a straight face said: SleeplessinSoCal Mar 2022 #93

This might have been worthy of rec until I reached bashing of DU editorializing segment msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #102

Clever turn of phrase that I can't say I disagree with... littlemissmartypants Apr 2022 #107

You can't declare that naysayers are wrong until the cuffs are on tfg ecstatic Apr 2022 #108

The naysayers have claimed, with certainty, that DOJ is doing "nothing" re: the coup Fiendish Thingy Apr 2022 #114

What's going to happen if Ginni Thomas is indicted? kimbutgar Apr 2022 #112

Nationwide celebrations? Fiendish Thingy Apr 2022 #113