Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,716 posts)
25. That's easy to say, but how do we accomplish it?
Fri Apr 8, 2022, 01:48 PM
Apr 2022

Unfortunately we've worked ourselves into a corner and become entirely dependent on high density energy sources for food, clean water, and comfortable shelter. Without these high density energy sources, now mostly derived from fossil fuels, I figure half of earth's human population wouldn't survive. Our continued use of fossil fuels will have similar consequences.

That's the primary reason I changed my mind about nuclear power. I used to be a radical anti-nuclear activist. Now I think it's the only path out of this mess.

Even conventional light water nuclear power plants, with all the usual circuses that accompany their construction, are preferable to any type of fossil fuel plant.

These light water reactors only extract a small fraction of the potential energy in their fuel. This used fuel can be stored safely on site indefinitely awaiting reprocessing for use in more efficient reactors.

The technology already exists to use fissionable materials that have already been mined as fuel. This includes used fuel from light water reactors, depleted uranium, plutonium from nuclear weapons, thorium and uranium extracted from mine tailings, etc..

The reason uranium has always been used in once-through fuel cycles is because it's readily available, and it's cheap as well if we ignore the environmental impacts of mining it.

Just as we ignore the much, much greater environmental impacts of fossil fuels.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ONE nuclear power plant equals 431 Commercial Wind Turbines. WarGamer Apr 2022 #1
431 commercial wind turbines don't melt down and threaten all life on earth. Scrivener7 Apr 2022 #4
neither do modern nuclear power plants. WarGamer Apr 2022 #6
OK. They only threaten life for a few miles around. Wind turbines don't do that either. Scrivener7 Apr 2022 #8
THIS!!! Nuclear is the only viable answer to counter climate change at this time Amishman Apr 2022 #9
There needs to be a little bit of everything, including nuclear dsp3000 Apr 2022 #15
+1, Germany could lead world in SMR tech since too many in US are sKeered uponit7771 Apr 2022 #30
No, but the huge blades end up in landfills Bonx Apr 2022 #20
This is the comparison everyone makes. Am I the only one who finds it dopey? Scrivener7 Apr 2022 #21
Probably. Bonx Apr 2022 #24
Democrats need to step into 21st century when it comes to nuke knowledge uponit7771 Apr 2022 #27
But how much cancer did it cause that day? SoonerPride Apr 2022 #2
But but how many eagles had to die?? Shermann Apr 2022 #3
That is nothing to sneeze at! Blues Heron Apr 2022 #5
THIS *is* also exciting news!!! Ty. 👍 electric_blue68 Apr 2022 #7
Without storage systems, a lot of that energy is intentionally wasted NickB79 Apr 2022 #10
Lots of high voltage monster transmission lines in NM womanofthehills Apr 2022 #11
Could electric vehicles and a smart grid Retired Engineer Bob Apr 2022 #13
Yep. NickB79 Apr 2022 #14
Well, do you want to prematurely wear out your expensive batteries to benefit your neighbors... hunter Apr 2022 #16
Yes, absolutely ... currently night energy in US is wasted even with FF turbines uponit7771 Apr 2022 #28
120 million American homes already have an energy storage system. lagomorph777 Apr 2022 #19
+1, uponit7771 Apr 2022 #29
NM wind project womanofthehills Apr 2022 #12
After reviewing the responses here, I've got to remind us all that the only reliable Ron Green Apr 2022 #17
This! But no one ever talks about this! It's the only answer. Scrivener7 Apr 2022 #18
That's easy to say, but how do we accomplish it? hunter Apr 2022 #25
I don't believe nuclear's a "path," but I could be wrong. Ron Green Apr 2022 #26
It's a frequent quip of mine that if I knew the secret of cheap fusion energy... hunter Apr 2022 #31
Wind power will only prolong our dependence on natural gas. hunter Apr 2022 #22
While that is true Finishline42 Apr 2022 #32
This post reminded me of Rush newdayneeded Apr 2022 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In a first, wind power is...»Reply #25