General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Psaki: Student loan borrowers likely to have to pay debt 'sometime' [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(182,393 posts)I am amused that you do not understand the concepts. Thank you for the laughs. Again, it is clear that you do not tire of being Wrong.
Your analogy on retirement was so bad that I was kind last night and left it alone. This analogy makes no sense but did amuse me. This policy appears to only apply to current debt and will not apply to persons who repaid their loans or person who incur future debt. Social security was a prospective program that applied to everyone going forward. People who saved for retirement prior to the adoption of social security still got social security benefits even if they saved for retirement. I was born well after the adoption of social security, and I have saved for retirement. Despite the fact that I have savings, I will get the benefit of social security. That is how things work in the real world. These benefits are in addition in the amounts saved. People who did not save still can get social security together with people who saved. Your analogy simply does not apply
You may want to read up on the concepts. This Forbes article may help. https://www.forbes.com/sites/zackfriedman/2022/02/04/democrats-tweet-that-student-loans-should-be-cancelled-but-twitter-claps-back/?sh=5117abf23abd
Again, it will take an act of congress to adopt such a policy and I doubt that such act can be adopted unless someone answers the questions set forth above. In addition, the cost of such a program has to be addressed
Link to tweet
We need to determine if canceling student loan debt for a limited group is the best use of such funds