General Discussion

Autumn

(48,962 posts)

80. You do know that reporters will agree to not release names, which is why they are called unnamed

Sat Apr 16, 2022, 05:15 PM

Apr 2022

sources, to get the story verified. There are videos of Feinstein having episodes. I suppose those actual videos are unproven gossip too.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

90 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Whoever those so-called unnamed Democratic Senators and ex-staffers were, who thought it was a good [View all] JohnSJ Apr 2022 OP

How do you know it was a Democrat that said something? dem4decades Apr 2022 #1

Because the SF Chronicle reported three unnamed Democratic Senators as doing it JohnSJ Apr 2022 #3

Article said it was from staffers/Senators. But the only name dropped was Feinstein's. Budi Apr 2022 #5

Here is the SF Chronicle link, and they said specifically there were three Democratic Senators JohnSJ Apr 2022 #14

Since they were public figures, they should be named. Budi Apr 2022 #16

I agree. Shame on them JohnSJ Apr 2022 #18

Yup. This is their predictable M.O. as an election nears. Budi Apr 2022 #24

I Can Say There ARe Six Democratic Senators But THat Doesn't Make It True Me. Apr 2022 #27

why would the newspaper make it up? JohnSJ Apr 2022 #28

THere Could Be A Number Of Reasons Why They printed It Me. Apr 2022 #29

touche' JohnSJ Apr 2022 #30

I know. I was thinking of rightwing trolls. ananda Apr 2022 #13

Vote blue no matter who. Tetrachloride Apr 2022 #2

I don't think that's why the party loses elections leftstreet Apr 2022 #4

Your post sure looks like an attack on Democrats from here. Kingofalldems Apr 2022 #6

Then be my guest JohnSJ Apr 2022 #9

No. It looks like sabotage with a gossip scoop to a sleazy journalist. Budi Apr 2022 #10

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 onecaliberal Apr 2022 #23

the SF Chronicle is hardly 'sleazy', it is the No Cal paper of record and extremely well respected Celerity Apr 2022 #36

why don't the Democrats who spread these rumors reveal themselves? bigtree Apr 2022 #62

The Chronicle is hardly some flaming radical lefty paper. Celerity Apr 2022 #65

it's an old political attack on Feinstein bigtree Apr 2022 #66

I disagree, and you are trying to frame your opinion as the only valid one, whist falsely assigning Celerity Apr 2022 #68

this is vile politics. I don't care if you're offended by my saying that bigtree Apr 2022 #70

Why do you keep trying to drag in progressives in to this? I never raised that issue. Perhaps Celerity Apr 2022 #72

did you forget the progressive leaning newspaper? bigtree Apr 2022 #73

Your attempts to frame the San Francisco Chronicle as some sort of leftie prog-hugging newspaper Celerity Apr 2022 #74

calling the paper progressive-leaning isn't a 'frame,' not even a criticism, just an observation bigtree Apr 2022 #75

No deflection at all. You have repeatedly tried to falsely assign a lefty prog-loving agenda to the Celerity Apr 2022 #77

well, it's really not the cornerstone of my argument bigtree Apr 2022 #78

Funny how that works, eh? BradAllison Apr 2022 #69

Yes BannonsLiver Apr 2022 #7

No one said that. But you. Budi Apr 2022 #11

Because doing unnamed through the media is such a courageous thing. JohnSJ Apr 2022 #12

Idgaf if they stuff her and roll her around like a weekend with Bernie. I WILL vote straight ticket onecaliberal Apr 2022 #8

Of course, but it is just the typical circular firing squad JohnSJ Apr 2022 #15

I literally just got a local news alert about this. This makes me really fucking mad. onecaliberal Apr 2022 #22

Boy, remember how Republicans did all that back-biting on Strom Thurmond? gratuitous Apr 2022 #17

They are doing and continue to do a lot of back stabbing of TFG Kaleva Apr 2022 #20

I do remember trent lott praising Thurmond's and his segregationist views, and how much better the JohnSJ Apr 2022 #21

Well if you remember Thurmond asked Joe Biden to do his eulogy. former9thward Apr 2022 #48

No, I probably wasn't paying attention, regardless it definitely isn't the same club that it was the JohnSJ Apr 2022 #55

Maybe it isn't. former9thward Apr 2022 #56

Thanks JohnSJ Apr 2022 #57

Meh. Feinstein is from a deep blue state. They probably wouldn't have done this otherwise. JoanofArgh Apr 2022 #19

Saboteurs of the Dem Party do this only in safe blue districts/States. Budi Apr 2022 #26

I am going to say: SF Chronicle is lying. Tetrachloride Apr 2022 #25

Whoever they are they did the right thing. Someone with dementia should not be in government. nt Autumn Apr 2022 #31

You mean reporting it as an UNNAMED source is the "right thing to do"? That speaks JohnSJ Apr 2022 #32

I never fucking claimed to be a doctor. As one who has had a family member Autumn Apr 2022 #33

I was being sarcastic, but you are saying Feinstein has "dementia". That is about as valid as Frist JohnSJ Apr 2022 #34

It was mentioned a few months back that she has dementia. I started paying attention. If people who Autumn Apr 2022 #35

unamed people. bull JohnSJ Apr 2022 #37

There have always been unnamed sources in governemnet. Chuck Schumer had conversations with her Autumn Apr 2022 #38

link? sheshe2 Apr 2022 #39

An easy google search. It was discussed here back in 2020. Autumn Apr 2022 #40

Welp sheshe2 Apr 2022 #41

Also, still unnamed people. I remember them trying to play this toward Biden, when the jackass JohnSJ Apr 2022 #42

You can't read the one about Schumer's talk with her either? Here you go. got his name and all. Autumn Apr 2022 #44

Welp. The first one I read and I'm not a member, how odd that is the one with Schumer. Autumn Apr 2022 #43

The Daily Mail is not "like any other newspaper". It is a right-wing rag and a questionable source. lapucelle Apr 2022 #46

I just posted similar to you. sheshe2 Apr 2022 #49

I saw that. I can't imagine ever normalizing the Daily Mail. lapucelle Apr 2022 #50

There are other sources. Try google. Done here. Autumn Apr 2022 #53

The Daily Mail is not a newspaper it is a tabloid. sheshe2 Apr 2022 #47

Interesting. sheshe2 Apr 2022 #51

Yet you still ignore the issue, there are other links about Schumer's talks with her. You don't have Autumn Apr 2022 #52

Night night sheshe2 Apr 2022 #54

You have to give this poster a lot of credit for being determined, though Hekate Apr 2022 #59

I do! sheshe2 Apr 2022 #60

I have to laugh at the contempt for the use of "unnamed sources". Exactly what kind of news do Midwestern Democrat Apr 2022 #61

so these pols with an axe to grind should be seen as credible? bigtree Apr 2022 #64

You do know that reporters will agree to not release names, which is why they are called unnamed Autumn Apr 2022 #80

anyone can get snipped and ridiculed as she's been bigtree Apr 2022 #81

That suits people who only want to hear what they want to hear perfectly. Mustn't spoil their Autumn Apr 2022 #79

this is worst of the comebacks bigtree Apr 2022 #82

Yet you ignore what had Schumer concerned so much that he talked to her about it. We won't agree on Autumn Apr 2022 #83

it was political bigtree Apr 2022 #84

Of course it's political. It's politics, she's a politician. Autumn Apr 2022 #85

but it's a canard bigtree Apr 2022 #86

No. It's not a canard. It's just not playing out in the media out of respect for her. That's why Autumn Apr 2022 #87

they are her political opponents. No one is dumb enough to believe they did this to help her bigtree Apr 2022 #88

Schumer is her political opponent? Sure. Autumn Apr 2022 #89

there are no direct quotes from Schumer about her mental state bigtree Apr 2022 #90

that's how the conversation was described in papers like Daily Mail and NYPost bigtree Apr 2022 #63

Nobody seems to complain when folks here label her a "corporate Dem"... brooklynite Apr 2022 #45

Who do you think are those unnamed Democrats are? JohnSJ Apr 2022 #58

Feinstein needs to retire budkin Apr 2022 #67

I agree with the OP LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2022 #71

She needs to retire. Diablo del sol Apr 2022 #76