General Discussion

Emile

(42,300 posts)

39. I don't remember defense, LOL.

Reply to noiretextatique (Reply #38)

Fri Apr 22, 2022, 12:29 PM

Apr 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

123 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Official MTG hearing thread: OMG [View all] rainy Apr 2022 OP

Sorry, I haven't followed this at all. Claustrum Apr 2022 #1

14 th amendment disallows a candidate rainy Apr 2022 #2

She's already perjured herself noiretextatique Apr 2022 #3

The Judge is biased? Maybe because it was a stupid lawsuit. We need to beat these MFers Hoyt Apr 2022 #4

Can you explain why you're so against these challenges? Nevilledog Apr 2022 #6

One: they're a waste of time. brooklynite Apr 2022 #7

What's your common sense telling you? Emile Apr 2022 #10

Honestly? Not guilty. brooklynite Apr 2022 #14

I DO agree with you to a point. BUT bluestarone Apr 2022 #12

+1 terrible precedent stopdiggin Apr 2022 #25

Well, one: They focus some attention to wrongdoing. Hortensis Apr 2022 #55

The Wet Blanket Brigade is strong today. nt Tommy Carcetti Apr 2022 #9

never happy, always anticipating the worst.. agingdem Apr 2022 #23

Want her off the ballot, even if there is no evidence? Thankfully, not how it works in a true democr Hoyt Apr 2022 #28

Yes.. agingdem Apr 2022 #52

LOL. "We need to beat these MFers at polls" PSPS Apr 2022 #78

Actually, redistricting this year seems to favor Democrats. Besides, you post is exactly why I Hoyt Apr 2022 #87

Gerrymandering is antithetical to democracy. Sorry you think otherwise. PSPS Apr 2022 #90

Redistricting in not necessarily gerrymandering. Redistricing this year seems to favor Democrats. Hoyt Apr 2022 #95

If I may? mzmolly Apr 2022 #114

I'm assuming you have evidence she "Conspired" to overturn election. Wouldn't put it past her, but Hoyt Apr 2022 #118

Are you watching the hearing? mzmolly Apr 2022 #119

Didn't see any evidence of "conspiring." Clearly she's a POS and stupid. Hoyt Apr 2022 #120

You might consider her own words, mzmolly Apr 2022 #121

I would prefer her not to be on the ballot either, but... Caliman73 Apr 2022 #45

Hard to tell from your summary what was actually presented to you - Ms. Toad Apr 2022 #97

True, but we have to go through the process ... Caliman73 Apr 2022 #103

You left out a critical part of the question - Ms. Toad Apr 2022 #109

I support these challenges. Nevilledog Apr 2022 #48

I know. Tommy Carcetti Apr 2022 #53

I know. Nevilledog Apr 2022 #56

"This is not a frivolous challenge." Agree. Hortensis Apr 2022 #63

you're right... agingdem Apr 2022 #69

+1 nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #50

Because we are wasting our friggin time on crud that is in the past. We have things to do for people Hoyt Apr 2022 #11

Agree--she will fundraise off of this crimycarny Apr 2022 #31

I don't see how one can legitimately assert they are wasting your time. Or mine. Torchlight Apr 2022 #32

In a democracy, you don't try to remove folks from the ballot. You vote against them. Sorry. Hoyt Apr 2022 #35

No need to apologize, simply support your assertions with data. Torchlight Apr 2022 #37

A judge disagreed with you nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #62

What judge? Do you have a citation. Hoyt Apr 2022 #67

The judge who allowed the case to proceed nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #71

Allowing a case to proceed isn't finding her guilty, unqualified, etc. Hoyt Apr 2022 #76

i never said it was, but you said the only means to remove her is by the ballot, or should be nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #79

Nope. I said we need to vote her out, not try some BS to keep her off the ballot. Besides, there Hoyt Apr 2022 #85

I just read what you wrote again, but whatever nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #88

Are we missing that the point here is to DESTROY Hortensis Apr 2022 #70

biased or not stopdiggin Apr 2022 #22

Stupid lawsuit and junk, eh? "Do you have a citation?" Torchlight Apr 2022 #68

I had to stop watching because I came to the same opinion about the judge Siwsan Apr 2022 #5

definitely makes me shaky! rainy Apr 2022 #13

I'm not seeing any bias... brooklynite Apr 2022 #16

You may just have sussed me out! I'm a 'Law and Order' addict! Siwsan Apr 2022 #26

My wife was a former Federal Prosecutor brooklynite Apr 2022 #44

I fully admit I'm waiting for a 'Colonel Jessup pushed to the brink' kind of moment Siwsan Apr 2022 #47

Yep, usually boring as hell, unless you are into the actual practice of law. Caliman73 Apr 2022 #49

Google the Bopp Law Firm. redstatebluegirl Apr 2022 #8

That may certainly be the case... Caliman73 Apr 2022 #59

Whatever one might think of the suit tishaLA Apr 2022 #15

and OH MY GAWD, she's wearing her cross. 🤬 🤬 🤬 a kennedy Apr 2022 #17

Isn't that always part of her get-up? AngryOldDem Apr 2022 #107

Yup, do not care for this judge at all.....🤮 🤮 🤮 a kennedy Apr 2022 #18

Who was he appointed by? n/t RamblingRose Apr 2022 #30

Yah, I wonder that as well...... a kennedy Apr 2022 #33

Some info on the judge in the MTG hearing...... a kennedy Apr 2022 #91

He's doing a perfectly reasonable job. brooklynite Apr 2022 #93

A democratic governor nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #116

Just like Zell Miller was a Democratic Governor. RamblingRose Apr 2022 #122

yep nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #123

Poor little MTG keithbvadu2 Apr 2022 #19

and that smug look on her face, may I request a slap??? Or is that inappropriate?? a kennedy Apr 2022 #20

she is a smug idiot noiretextatique Apr 2022 #34

Her district deserves her. Raftergirl Apr 2022 #21

Wow. Our friends in that district have to hear Hortensis Apr 2022 #72

These fascists HATE having to accept cilla4progress Apr 2022 #24

where is the evidence of this widespread fraud? noiretextatique Apr 2022 #101

There sure is a lot MN2theMax Apr 2022 #27

Judge is not sustaining objections by the defense now noiretextatique Apr 2022 #29

I don't remember, I don't remember taking the oath of office, I just don't remember. Emile Apr 2022 #36

I don't remember: the refuge of a lying coward nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #38

I don't remember defense, LOL. Emile Apr 2022 #39

Does she suffer cognitive decline? tishaLA Apr 2022 #40

Brain damage? Emile Apr 2022 #42

Forget the 14th: She's making a great case for invoking the 25th! noiretextatique Apr 2022 #43

Nah, this is just your run-of-the-mill sociopathy in someone who is as dumb as a stump. nt GoCubsGo Apr 2022 #61

I don't think she had much room for decline jcgoldie Apr 2022 #74

She needs a doctor, her memory is concerning. ahem chowder66 Apr 2022 #41

Right?! Here we have an elected official who claims not to recall noiretextatique Apr 2022 #46

She's lying and she's very proud of it. chowder66 Apr 2022 #60

Clearly...I want to see that smug look wiped off her stupid face nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #65

Smug is what came to mind for me as well. chowder66 Apr 2022 #66

"I don't remember" "I don't recall" - when presented with direct evidence. AnotherMother4Peace Apr 2022 #51

RW nutcases believe the George Floyd protests "justify" the Capitol insurrection nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #57

Yep. And she just remembered the year 2019 of her Feb video calling for protests. chowder66 Apr 2022 #58

Yet another lie: she's a QAnon nutcase nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #54

This is not going well for the plaintiffs brooklynite Apr 2022 #64

true, and there does not seem to be a smoking gun on the horizon nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #73

i don't condone violence of any kind, but i bring my gun to work nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #75

The ronnie raygun defense... another waste of life Fullduplexxx Apr 2022 #77

I'm sorry Mossfern Apr 2022 #80

Same here PatSeg Apr 2022 #83

I've said that to my husband tons of times. No one takes their hats off anymore.....😡 a kennedy Apr 2022 #86

Is he dumbing down the questions for her? Mossfern Apr 2022 #81

The Plaintiff's lawyer is trying to get MTG to say she supported the insurrection. brooklynite Apr 2022 #82

Oh boy, now she is showing us how little of American history and government she really understands Novara Apr 2022 #84

She doesn't know much about the Proud Boys Mossfern Apr 2022 #89

one good thing about this case: she is lying under oath noiretextatique Apr 2022 #92

The testimony is a potential gold mine of evidence of perjury Wednesdays Apr 2022 #94

i agree...this dummy is so arrogant she is digging a big gaping hole noiretextatique Apr 2022 #96

now she is claiming the videos of her insane rantings are not authentic or take out of context noiretextatique Apr 2022 #98

FOR WHAT ITS WORTH!!! rainy Apr 2022 #99

FOR WHAT ITS WORTH!!! rainy Apr 2022 #100

I don't think she's taking this seriously Mossfern Apr 2022 #102

She is not taking it seriously at all noiretextatique Apr 2022 #104

She's not. AngryOldDem Apr 2022 #106

Reminds Me Of Rottenhouse Judge WiVoter Apr 2022 #105

Iteresting overhearing discussions on hot mike Mossfern Apr 2022 #108

If MTJ thought the crowd was BLM and antifa rainy Apr 2022 #110

Wish you were Mossfern Apr 2022 #112

excellent question nt noiretextatique Apr 2022 #117

It's a miracle, her memory is coming back when her lawyer is asking questions! Emile Apr 2022 #111

She sent that "be peaceful" video Mossfern Apr 2022 #113

I just put on an a.m. radio and the hosts are even calling her wacko and said she's not IcyPeas Apr 2022 #115