Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Judge declares Marjorie Taylor Green a hostile witness [View all]
https://www.rawstory.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-testimony/?recip_id=31440&list_id=1A judge declared Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R-GA) an adverse witness after she repeatedly evaded questions by an attorney who represents voters challenging her eligibility to hold federal office.
The Georgia Republican testified Friday during an evidentiary hearing in the lawsuit, which argues that Greene should be removed from the 2022 ballot because she supported the Jan. 6 insurrection, and she clashed with Free Speech for People attorney Andrew Celli over whether she believed in December 2020 that Donald Trump's election loss was fraudulent.
"When you sent out this tweet, you wanted people to read the tweet and know that it was your view that the vote for Mr. Biden for president was fraudulent, or some of them were," Celli said, but Greene denied that. "I am asking when you sent this, you are communicating to your people who read this Twitter account that you believe that there were fraudulent votes for Mr. Biden, and your goal was to keep the president in the White House."
Greene said she was looking for a senator to join her objection to Biden's election, which she said was her responsibility as a member of Congress.
"I'm entitled to get answers to my question, your honor," Celli said. "Can I ask the court to acknowledge that this is an adverse witness, a hostile witness?"
The judge agreed, saying Greene was an adverse witness and the attorney had a right to cross examine her.
"I would ask the court to remind the witness that in this posture, she has to answer my questions, she cannot give speeches," Celli said. "Is that fair?"
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wish the plaintiffs lawyer had better anticipated how unresponsive MTG would be.
JMCKUSICK
Apr 2022
#2
Plaintiff can ask leading questions with yes/no responses as in cross-examination
housecat
Apr 2022
#59
There should also be a Snotty witness classification. I don't what they would do with that, but
brewens
Apr 2022
#40
I watched her for a few minutes, but couldn't bear listening to her whiny voice or looking at her
sop
Apr 2022
#6
Do we have the wherewithal to hold her accountable for her speech and actions fomenting violence?
Evolve Dammit
Apr 2022
#13
Way way too much lenience IMO. It's damn bizarre. But catch a kid with a little pot
RKP5637
Apr 2022
#33
Kinda like fiddling while Rome burns. And yes, there's a good example of two tiered justice.
Evolve Dammit
Apr 2022
#50
I vaguely recall a situation, widely reported, where a victim was shot dead at
empedocles
Apr 2022
#15
I vaguely recall a situation, widely reported, years back, where a victim was shot dead at
empedocles
Apr 2022
#17