Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NashvilleLefty

(811 posts)
22. Although I agree that repeal of Glass-Steagal
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 09:47 PM
Jan 2012

was a HUGE mistake and ultimately did lead to many of the problems of the current recession, this reads like a "hit piece". Just read the first 2 sentences:

Many Democrats wish Bill Clinton still occupied the White House. However, before you put him in Mt. Rushmore, you might want to investigate his role in the mortgage foreclosure crisis.


Now, I agree that some Leftys look at Bill Clinton like Rightys look at Ronald Regan and we should have an objective look at each of them, but this particular piece seems to take many liberties.

Repealing Glass-Steagal was a mistake, but it wasn't all Clinton's fault. And it wasn't a total repeal of the New Deal as the blogger suggests. The repeal was wrong and a major mistake, but it's also wrong to summarize Clinton's 8 years with this single mistake IMHO.

It would be much more productive to create a new, updated version of Glass-Steagal rather than pointing fingers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think I'll skip it izquierdista Jan 2012 #1
How much say did bubba have ? surfdog Jan 2012 #2
He had a lot of say izquierdista Jan 2012 #4
From what I know ... JoePhilly Jan 2012 #6
The senate vote was 90-8 surfdog Jan 2012 #15
Yup ... and if I recall ... JoePhilly Jan 2012 #24
It was written by three GOP'ers and was veto proof. Sirveri Jan 2012 #17
True perhaps, but one can still veto things on principle (nt) The Straight Story Jan 2012 #20
And bill would have looked very weak surfdog Jan 2012 #21
I'd rather look weak to those who were weak, than actually be weak (nt) The Straight Story Jan 2012 #23
Actually, that article is BULL SHIT, and I'll explain why. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #3
+1 redqueen Jan 2012 #5
In one version of this that I read a while ago ... JoePhilly Jan 2012 #7
Excellent Post. Old and In the Way Jan 2012 #8
And may I say .. Great ADDITION to my post ... !!! JoePhilly Jan 2012 #9
Thanks to you too. Cameron27 Jan 2012 #11
was he distracted or Whisp Jan 2012 #12
You claim that... surfdog Jan 2012 #14
He didn't have to sign anything, but it would have passed anyways. Sirveri Jan 2012 #18
Nearly every democrat voted for the bill surfdog Jan 2012 #19
Interesting, thanks. Cameron27 Jan 2012 #10
NP ... and I understand the situation you describe ... JoePhilly Jan 2012 #25
That is a core conflict. Old and In the Way Jan 2012 #26
An oldy but a goodie, Krugman on NAFTA: joshcryer Jan 2012 #28
+2 n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2012 #13
Here's an interesting clip from TYT on this. AtomicKitten Jan 2012 #16
Although I agree that repeal of Glass-Steagal NashvilleLefty Jan 2012 #22
Love this thread Cameron27 Jan 2012 #27
In addition to Gramm-Bliley-Leech, the Clinton administration mmonk Jan 2012 #29
meh mdmc Jan 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill Clinton and the repe...»Reply #22