Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Noah: Give it up for Kyrsten Sinema. Who'd ever thought we'd see the day in American politics when a [View all]Celerity
(54,940 posts)24. Gallego is hardly some flame throwing lefty Squad member
The last time that I felt compelled to offer as many reference links to support a simple statement or opinion was when I wrote my research paper for my advanced organic chemistry class in 1987 (before you were born and most people were on the Internet).
I learned very early on here that there are certain types of posters who will (I have no problem with this) demand evidence and/or reference points for claims made that they happen to not like. Thus I tend to put some effort into some of my replies.
I also have seen some of these same types make claims, and when either rebutted with evidence or even simply challenged, revert to a stance that that intimates (or openly states) their opinions are unassailable facts.
Some go even further and imply that to challenge their opinions is a priori evidence of ill intent and nefarious motives on the part of other posters who disagree with them. They basically want to claim that they and they alone (plus others who share their stances) are the only true and legit arbiters of what is correct and permissible in terms of debate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
125 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Noah: Give it up for Kyrsten Sinema. Who'd ever thought we'd see the day in American politics when a [View all]
riversedge
Apr 2022
OP
What about Manchin? I use closed captioning, but it was not clear some of the time.
tblue37
May 2022
#15
Something about the most powerful politician in Washington as he briefly looked at Biden then said
MLAA
May 2022
#61
Oh geez..great line ! SAS to Senema ! (Spanish colloquial: a figurative kick to the gut ! )
RestoreAmerica2020
Apr 2022
#8
If anything, I think that Senator Sinema is more concerned by the censure that the Arizona Democrats
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#80
No, not in a midterm year. during the primary is appropriate which is two years away.
Demsrule86
May 2022
#52
You'll have your opportunity to express your displeasure when it counts in the 2024 primaries if she
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#115
That's exactly what her Democratic constituency in Arizona is waiting to see,
lees1975
May 2022
#120
Really. Most of her her campaign $ this year came from GOP PAC's, why would that be?
Yoyoyo77
May 2022
#78
Sinema and Manchin have been wrecking balls of destruction for large parts of Biden's and almost
Celerity
May 2022
#14
I disagree with your framing, and I could not care less about what some dismal RW sites/blogs
Celerity
May 2022
#17
I'm not going to search for it because I don't feel like I have to offer a ton of support
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#18
Never said you did, TT, but others have. I was only giving you background on why I do what I do.
Celerity
May 2022
#29
And you can also get a hide for posting actual facts. Because they're not popular facts.
oldsoftie
May 2022
#40
And I'll disagree with you since it really is a maybe or maybe not situation.
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#37
If we should lose our majorities in the House or Senate, I think that it will be for other reasons
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#31
Green energy development is not going to have any noticeable impact prior to the mid-terms.
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#77
I know what was in the BBB so don't insult me by assuming that I'm ignorant.
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#90
I know the setting, but I'm puzzled why so many here are taking glee in the slam.
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#33
Where would be a better place for Democrats to criticize a Democratic senator?
WhiskeyGrinder
May 2022
#36
The difference is that Senator Sinema is a Democrat and hasn't been bought out by the Russians
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#56
So criticism of Democratic senators, even from Democrats wanting Democrats to be better, is
WhiskeyGrinder
May 2022
#49
However, if you read through this thread you will see very few comments that actually want Senator
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#57
Do as you please, but criticizing a sitting Democratic Senator without whom, we would not
Demsrule86
May 2022
#53
Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema Cheered By Conservatives For Applauding Trump Tax Cuts at SOTU
tenderfoot
May 2022
#100
Okay, if you live in Arizona you are welcome to vote for another candidate in the primary in 2024.
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#102
Sinema has her reasons as to her votes, even if we aren't satisfied with her explanations.
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#48
Check out how she tried to get McConnel's attention before she gave a thumbs down and did a curtsy.
helpisontheway
May 2022
#65
Yes, if you make an absurd statement then I will challenge it and ask for proof.
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#113
She refuses to explain her positions or meet with her voters - the criticism is warranted
tenderfoot
May 2022
#46
She did offer an explanation as to why she did not vote to remove the filibuster.
TexasTowelie
May 2022
#55
Criticism is allowed if backed by reasonable facts like voting against major Democratic initiatives.
Lucky Luciano
May 2022
#82
Best line of the night (in addition to all the deSantis jabs and President's jab about all Fox News
MLAA
May 2022
#58
He really made people think hard about a lot of things, and showed the inside/outside contradictions
bucolic_frolic
May 2022
#110