Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

generators former-republican Oct 2012 #1
Today, the Director of FEMA told Governors that whatever they needed to pull the election DonViejo Oct 2012 #12
Yes, but can the states be FORCED to USE whatever it takes? Repub states don't WANT voters. nt valerief Oct 2012 #14
I'd like to see a governor refuse generators to keep polling places closed former-republican Oct 2012 #17
I disagree. A governor would do that with no repercussions. valerief Oct 2012 #20
Don't be silly... brooklynite Oct 2012 #22
The fewer the number of voters, the greater the vote-flips for Republicans. valerief Oct 2012 #24
Fema director on MSM says I offered generators to the governor of (state) former-republican Oct 2012 #30
It can. It very well can. And for the reason I've provided. 2010. nt valerief Oct 2012 #37
I'm going to disagree with you on this issue but hopefully we won't have to find out former-republican Oct 2012 #43
I, too, hope it won't happen, but nothing surprises me anymore. valerief Oct 2012 #45
I disagree with you on that madokie Oct 2012 #26
Stimulous money is a very different political issue from denying DonViejo Oct 2012 #34
Absolutely , what governor is going to go on TV and tell his state I decided former-republican Oct 2012 #38
A Governor who isn't real interested in being re-elected. nt DonViejo Oct 2012 #50
they'll do it if it fits their agenda, with no consequences at all 0rganism Oct 2012 #35
I'm sure Rick Scott would try something like that if he could. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2012 #65
way it should be former-republican Oct 2012 #16
I Think That Democrats Will Be Incredibly Motivated To Vote SingleSeatBiggerMeat Oct 2012 #2
My guesds is no they won't the polls will close on tues night napi21 Oct 2012 #3
Uh, where the storm is where most Americans live. nt valerief Oct 2012 #21
Just curious Aerows Oct 2012 #62
We don't have early voting in Mass, except via absentee ballot and you need valerief Oct 2012 #64
This may be a surprise, but the population density of the US isn't uniform. (nt) Posteritatis Oct 2012 #27
Exactly n/t Aerows Oct 2012 #63
Paper ballots Generic Other Oct 2012 #4
Democracy will find a way Floyd_Gondolli Oct 2012 #5
Hopefully! burrowowl Oct 2012 #7
It's not hope, it's fact Floyd_Gondolli Oct 2012 #15
It's fact that democracy will find a way? Unknown Beatle Oct 2012 #23
I Wasn't speaking to stolen elections Floyd_Gondolli Oct 2012 #33
Oppsies Unknown Beatle Oct 2012 #40
I have had friends who are now dead burrowowl Oct 2012 #25
Fascism doublethink Oct 2012 #6
Democratic GOTV efforts in urban areas is incredible RomneyLies Oct 2012 #8
I'm thinking (hoping) DryHump Oct 2012 #9
This morning the President mentioned emergency generation nadinbrzezinski Oct 2012 #10
polling places are key priority for restoring electricity BainsBane Oct 2012 #11
No. All the states have to have the official election on same day. They'll act before then. Honeycombe8 Oct 2012 #13
So if election were tomorrow all these states would be out of lack? LisaL Oct 2012 #19
No they don't. Otherwise early voting would be illegal. NYC Liberal Oct 2012 #32
ITA. If we all had to vote on the same day, how is it that many of us (including myself) LisaL Oct 2012 #36
I stand corrected. The "official" electoral college day for all the states has to be the same. So Honeycombe8 Oct 2012 #39
But all states have to appoint their electors..... dems_rightnow Oct 2012 #42
Here's the law: NYC Liberal Oct 2012 #51
Over 3 million people have no electricity because of this storm clydefrand Oct 2012 #18
Paper ballots and supplied generators for lighting. Posteritatis Oct 2012 #28
There wouldn't be time to get paper ballots supplied to all polling places in all those states. nt Honeycombe8 Oct 2012 #41
Sure there is. jeff47 Oct 2012 #47
The countdown doesn't start today. It starts from when they realize they won't have power there... Honeycombe8 Oct 2012 #52
It also assumes passable roads, both for transporting ballots and for people to get to the polls. gkhouston Oct 2012 #53
Because it's impossible for cars to drive on anything other than dry pavement. jeff47 Oct 2012 #55
FEMA has already said they'll pay. jeff47 Oct 2012 #54
Drones? We don't distribute that many drones. Honeycombe8 Oct 2012 #58
Reading. You should try it. (nt) jeff47 Oct 2012 #60
This isn't a hard problem to solve. jeff47 Oct 2012 #46
+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #49
How are the people going to get there? How are they going to know what their local poll place is? Honeycombe8 Oct 2012 #59
Wow I really hope no one ever asks you to solve their day-to-day problems jeff47 Oct 2012 #61
I don't see it as having much impact, with the exception of PA. bluedigger Oct 2012 #29
evidently, if we miss the election date, the world will go on tilt quinnox Oct 2012 #31
I share your concern jimlup Oct 2012 #44
This is an extremely easy problem to solve. jeff47 Oct 2012 #48
I agree 100% SickOfTheOnePct Oct 2012 #56
Why design new ballots? jeff47 Oct 2012 #57
I'm more wondering about precincts that may still be underwater Waiting For Everyman Oct 2012 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What will happen if thous...»Reply #10