Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

former9thward

(33,424 posts)

10. The clerks and other staff sign contracts forbidding release of information.

Reply to HAB911 (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2022, 11:40 AM

May 2022

I suspect if one of Biden's staff leaked Oval Office conversations then many would be upset.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What law was broken by the "leaker"? [View all] HAB911 May 2022 OP

The court has no ethics RANDYWILDMAN May 2022 #1

"tradition." SoonerPride May 2022 #2

Winner winner chicken dinner! JustAnotherGen May 2022 #3

That is a good question... TheRealNorth May 2022 #4

Well, we know it's not being married to and taking direction from a Tea Party QAnon lunatic. TheBlackAdder May 2022 #5

How do we know that exactly? Hugh_Lebowski May 2022 #12

I responded to what law was being broken, not by whom. TheBlackAdder May 2022 #18

Gotcha :) nt Hugh_Lebowski May 2022 #20

Check out this that's hot off the presses. TheBlackAdder May 2022 #23

Good insights, thanks for sharing ... Hugh_Lebowski May 2022 #24

None. They can be canned I'm sure, but that's it. ck4829 May 2022 #6

Or Fox, Liberty University, etc ... we don't know who did it (nt) Hugh_Lebowski May 2022 #13

True ck4829 May 2022 #14

Why would they want to hire someone with a history of leaking internal documents? MichMan May 2022 #28

Gotta work to eat ck4829 May 2022 #30

Distraction... when asked about the message in the leak they can deflect to a leaker Fullduplexxx May 2022 #7

None that I know of gratuitous May 2022 #8

It's the "don't do what I do, just do what I say" louis-t May 2022 #9

The clerks and other staff sign contracts forbidding release of information. former9thward May 2022 #10

Everyone should be upset... Matthew Hale and his spectral evidence... Wow! ck4829 May 2022 #15

good question Tickle May 2022 #11

FBI is a political tool. They follow orders not the law. cbabe May 2022 #16

Who is ordering them to investigate it? MichMan May 2022 #29

Justice Roberts. But does he have legal right to initiate an investigation? cbabe May 2022 #31

The only laws that were broken were by Thomas. onecaliberal May 2022 #17

I had advance knowledge of an opinion once Cicada May 2022 #19

The Court is just pissed because someone stole the thunder of them being to announce their Chainfire May 2022 #21

Timing... lame54 May 2022 #32

Live hearings may be banned before June. Chainfire May 2022 #35

Ashton Fox Embry who leaked a Supreme Court decision was indicted... PoliticAverse May 2022 #22

None obamanut2012 May 2022 #25

Being disbarred I suppose at a minimum MichMan May 2022 #26

It seems that spouses also have no ethics rules. Delmette2.0 May 2022 #27

One spouse in particular comes to mind... ultralite001 May 2022 #33

In republicon world, telling the truth is tantamount to law breaking. spanone May 2022 #34