Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That was my first thought, too -- I agree obamanut2012 May 2022 #1
Alito wants the leaker's name released. louis-t May 2022 #2
Projection being so strong, I'm starting to believe Alito leaked it himself Walleye May 2022 #7
I would believe Roberts leaked before I would believe Alito. louis-t May 2022 #10
Probably true, but I bet Alito was eager to show it off and brag about it Walleye May 2022 #12
I still think Alito wanted to wait until after the midterms to announce it. louis-t May 2022 #14
Maybe Ginni Thomas then, she seems stupid enough Walleye May 2022 #16
On the eve of the first Republican primaries to help Trump endorsees question everything May 2022 #3
Sometimes leakers don't have a grand plan or sophisticated strategy... RockRaven May 2022 #4
If you're a Republican you can lie your head off, telling the truth is a mortal sin Walleye May 2022 #5
I'm curious who else got the leaked memo AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #6
That's optimistic iemanja May 2022 #8
Important reminder about the religious zealot Alito dalton99a May 2022 #9
Contradicting himself in his own opinion BruceWane May 2022 #18
Or, could the leak be part of the radical right's long game of destroying the public's faith in LaMouffette May 2022 #11
You could be right. The Court's legitimacy was already on shaky ground Walleye May 2022 #17
If only people would've listen to those who warned us Eliot Rosewater May 2022 #13
Roberts should look inside his own staff. maxsolomon May 2022 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ruth Marcus explains why ...»Reply #5