Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,958 posts)
27. What we know about the investigation into the Supreme Court leak-What Crime is at play
Tue May 3, 2022, 08:05 PM
May 2022

There is no crime at play here



https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/03/politics/supreme-court-leak-investigation/index.html?utm_term=link&utm_source=twCNNp&utm_content=2022-05-03T23%3A43%3A04&utm_medium=social

's unclear what crime could be investigated and whether the FBI and the Justice Department have the authority to look into a leak that doesn't have to do with classified or sensitive information.

Moreover, after leading politically sensitive investigations of presidential candidates and a sitting president in recent years, Justice Department and FBI officials are loath to get the bureau involved in what may end up being a political effort to try to affect the outcome of the court's final opinion in the case.

"Leaks of government information, by themselves, are not crimes," said Steve Vladeck, a CNN Supreme Court analyst who's a professor at the University of Texas School of Law. "Usually, leakers are prosecuted for leaking classified information, which this isn't, or for offenses related to how they obtained the information they leaked."

"But without one of those hooks, or some kind of financial harm to the government arising from the leak, there's no federal criminal statute that makes leaking of simply confidential governmental information unlawful," Vladeck added.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Probably an HR violation, but law? Nah n/t leftstreet May 2022 #1
Ashton Fox Embry who leaked a Supreme Court decision was indicted... PoliticAverse May 2022 #2
The issue in that case was trading on government information for financial gain. Ocelot II May 2022 #19
The law he was indicted on did not involve financial gain. n/t PoliticAverse May 2022 #20
Its on shaky ground in regards to consequences, they might get fired but uponit7771 May 2022 #3
Fired? Then I hope it was Alito JohnSJ May 2022 #13
TRUE !! uponit7771 May 2022 #15
It's all meant to distract from the larger issue that we have a right-wing radical Supreme Court TheRealNorth May 2022 #4
I don't think that will work for this JohnSJ May 2022 #14
The right to privacy... AZ8theist May 2022 #5
But the Supreme Court should have control over their own body... Bucky May 2022 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music May 2022 #6
Some seem more interested in the leaker Deuxcents May 2022 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music May 2022 #36
WHY ISNT THE FBI SEARCHING FOR THE TOP SECRET DOCUMENTS A MARA LAGO? onecaliberal May 2022 #8
No law was broken. SoonerPride May 2022 #9
It isn't illegal; it's against the rules of the Supreme Court. Ocelot II May 2022 #10
Potentially, 18 USC 641 onenote May 2022 #11
It's a real stretch. Ocelot II May 2022 #18
Maybe. But see: onenote May 2022 #30
What's the purpose of keeping it secretly hidden? Emile May 2022 #12
Theoretically, proposed opinions are still in the "consideration" stage Bucky May 2022 #25
IMO it was leaked on purpose to test the waters! n/t RKP5637 May 2022 #16
My thoughts exactly... SheilaAnn May 2022 #21
Roe rso May 2022 #17
I'm certain one of the terms of employment is non-disclosal of privileged communications Bucky May 2022 #22
This right here. LiberatedUSA May 2022 #24
Breaking the terms of your employment maxrandb May 2022 #26
What we know about the investigation into the Supreme Court leak-What Crime is at play LetMyPeopleVote May 2022 #27
These IDIOTS want to go after someone, (in the SC) that leaked the TRUTH. yet bluestarone May 2022 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author jfz9580m May 2022 #29
Possibly Contempt of Court? Mr.Bill May 2022 #31
I assume grand juries probably have laws because ordinary citizens serve LeftInTX May 2022 #34
Don't take offense, but Mr.Bill May 2022 #35
From Barbara McQuade LetMyPeopleVote May 2022 #32
Likely theft of Government documents... brooklynite May 2022 #33
The most likely charge you will see from this is lying to the FBI dsc May 2022 #37
Take a page of opinion James48 May 2022 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can someone tell me what ...»Reply #27