Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Raskin brings up a truly horrifying scenario [View all]ancianita
(43,322 posts)45. Mr. Raskin, as a fellow Democrat, I have to remind you that you're the constitutionalist.
Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992)
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
167,230,000 females fixed that for you, Mr. Raskin.
EVEN LAURENCE TRIBE BRINGS UP THE NINTH AMENDMENT.
As Obama the constitution professor would say, come ON. You're not helpless.
Have the House and Senate ENUMERATE the rights that the Constitution doesn't.
Then see if SCOTUS strikes them down. They won't.
But they won't advise you and Congress on what rights to enumerate in the new law, either.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
167,230,000 females fixed that for you, Mr. Raskin.
EVEN LAURENCE TRIBE BRINGS UP THE NINTH AMENDMENT.
As Obama the constitution professor would say, come ON. You're not helpless.
Have the House and Senate ENUMERATE the rights that the Constitution doesn't.
Then see if SCOTUS strikes them down. They won't.
But they won't advise you and Congress on what rights to enumerate in the new law, either.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How long before they start taking babies away from unfit (as they deem) mothers?
NightWatcher
May 2022
#2
Christo-Fascists. I think you are correct. They are crazy and are fomenting violence.
Evolve Dammit
May 2022
#51
Just to be clear, I was in no way suggesting that this ruling is anything but a horrible event.
StevieM
May 2022
#26
Yes that is how it happened back then. Selling babies was a lucrative business.
Irish_Dem
May 2022
#27
Congressman Raskin is a constitutional law scholar and he is correct on this
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2022
#23
What happened to the UNITED STATES? The incessant regressionism is akin to refighting the Civil War.
live love laugh
May 2022
#34
Mr. Raskin, as a fellow Democrat, I have to remind you that you're the constitutionalist.
ancianita
May 2022
#45
"Have the House and Senate ENUMERATE the rights that the Constitution doesn't."
BumRushDaShow
May 2022
#48
Maybe not. They still have women and girls and grandkids in their lives. So it's real for them, too.
ancianita
May 2022
#50
Gotta get more women on the bench and in prosecutors offices. This is legalized malevolence.
ancianita
May 2022
#47