Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

herding cats

(20,010 posts)

19. That's A job of Congress not Biden.

Reply to in2herbs (Reply #16)

Thu May 5, 2022, 11:57 PM

May 2022

It says so right there in the meat of you post. I'm not being ugly, but a lot of people will just read your header (just like misleading headlines) and blame the wrong branch of government. Civics are lost on way too many people anymore.

Yeah, you're correct, it's not going to happen because we don't have that kind of a majority. Simple fact is we can't expand the court and they know we can't. Thus, what's taking place now and the push by many to blame it on the Democratic people in office.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What are the chances that if a national abortion law passes, it would get struck down? [View all] Polybius May 2022 OP

They would merely trot out the same argument as in the Dobbs case. Wednesdays May 2022 #1

no, that argument wouldn't work qazplm135 May 2022 #5

With this court, they could apply ANY reasoning. Wednesdays May 2022 #10

no they can't qazplm135 May 2022 #15

Fetus personhood exboyfil May 2022 #11

What if it does not . . . . Lovie777 May 2022 #2

The only way to safeguard it is to make it an Amendment. Cartoonist May 2022 #3

Gerrymandering makes this unlikely NowISeetheLight May 2022 #4

Gerrymandering won't matter much on this Polybius May 2022 #6

Gerrymandering has no effect statewide. Cartoonist May 2022 #8

SCOTUS can invalidate any law they want SoonerPride May 2022 #7

Sure, but would it be the right decision to strike it down? Polybius May 2022 #9

Legally speaking, there are no good reasons to axe it. Ms. Toad May 2022 #12

Put the Senate vote out there, ASAP. OAITW r.2.0 May 2022 #13

with current SC? Chances are 100% AlexSFCA May 2022 #14

If Biden expands the court -- or even establishes a new Supreme Court to replace the current USSC in2herbs May 2022 #16

"justices who shall be removed if they lied, in any form" Polybius May 2022 #17

Sadly true. herding cats May 2022 #20

That's A job of Congress not Biden. herding cats May 2022 #19

what's the Tickle May 2022 #18

A federal law stating a woman has the right to choose Polybius May 2022 #21