Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court opinion on abortion uses the phrase "domestic supply of infants." It's on page 34 [View all]LeftInTX
(34,344 posts)2. That is a quote from the CDC
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/7033
The fact is: There is less stigma for single parents. Mothers don't give their infants up for adoption anymore. The Right to Life people actually encourage this as a way to dissuade abortion, "You can keep your child. There are support systems"
Abortion is not a reason for infant shortage, the Right to Life people are!
ETA: After reading the report:
The report does not even mention abortion.
The fact is: There is less stigma for single parents. Mothers don't give their infants up for adoption anymore. The Right to Life people actually encourage this as a way to dissuade abortion, "You can keep your child. There are support systems"
Abortion is not a reason for infant shortage, the Right to Life people are!
ETA: After reading the report:
It shows that the practice of relinquishing an infant for adoption has remained very low at 1.0% of babies born during this period.
The report does not even mention abortion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court opinion on abortion uses the phrase "domestic supply of infants." It's on page 34 [View all]
Swede
May 2022
OP
The facts are: Women who are single keep their children and no longer give them up for adoption
LeftInTX
May 2022
#35
Sort of like China's for-profit forced organ harvesting using political prisoners as donors.
sop
May 2022
#3
That is the whole point to "smaller gov't", less regs, more opportunity for corruption...
Thomas Hurt
May 2022
#11
Yes, and which groups are lobbying Congress for favorable adoption laws and materiel
bucolic_frolic
May 2022
#16
Why aren't the reporters asking these people what the government will pay per forced birth?
Tumbulu
May 2022
#5
I'm surprised some anti-abortion apologist hasn't yet argued pregnant women will now be able to
sop
May 2022
#36
There are enough idiots in that cohort that I wouldn't be surprised
littlemissmartypants
May 2022
#46
That is just awful. What are they going to do have baby factories with enslaved women..wouldn't
Demsrule86
May 2022
#12
The funny thing is that the forced birth movement caused this lack of supply
Farmer-Rick
May 2022
#27
Yes, they will need to stigmatize single mothers again in order for moms to give up their infants.
LeftInTX
May 2022
#43
It was an industry from about 1850 to the 1960s, shipping orphans and poor kids
bucolic_frolic
May 2022
#15
But what the hell does that have to do with the question of constitutionality?!?!?!?!?
groundloop
May 2022
#20
Not a single thing. It's based on the fact that single women tend to keep their children nowadays
LeftInTX
May 2022
#38
It's not enough to take control of the bodies of potential mothers.
littlemissmartypants
May 2022
#52