General Discussion

Hekate

(100,133 posts)

19. Alito's intentions are, shall we say, naked and unashamed now, aren't they?

Reply to Swede (Original post)

Sat May 7, 2022, 02:33 PM

May 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court opinion on abortion uses the phrase "domestic supply of infants." It's on page 34 [View all] Swede May 2022 OP

Alito and the GOP see fertile women as "Producers" Pachamama May 2022 #1

and in early Japan women were allowed to fight YoshidaYui May 2022 #26

That is a quote from the CDC LeftInTX May 2022 #2

The section for which that forms a footnote is therefore relevant muriel_volestrangler May 2022 #32

The facts are: Women who are single keep their children and no longer give them up for adoption LeftInTX May 2022 #35

Sort of like China's for-profit forced organ harvesting using political prisoners as donors. sop May 2022 #3

Yes. n/t barbaraann May 2022 #10

Perhaps it's time to check out who is investing in adoption services? TheBlackAdder May 2022 #4

That is the whole point to "smaller gov't", less regs, more opportunity for corruption... Thomas Hurt May 2022 #11

Yes, and which groups are lobbying Congress for favorable adoption laws and materiel bucolic_frolic May 2022 #16

Sure seems that way, doesn't it? Scary sh!t. ❤ littlemissmartypants May 2022 #45

Why aren't the reporters asking these people what the government will pay per forced birth? Tumbulu May 2022 #5

I'm surprised some anti-abortion apologist hasn't yet argued pregnant women will now be able to sop May 2022 #36

There are enough idiots in that cohort that I wouldn't be surprised littlemissmartypants May 2022 #46

There's also artificial insemination by sperm donors. greatauntoftriplets May 2022 #6

Great point. Someone else on another thread mentioned littlemissmartypants May 2022 #48

Betsy deVos and big business child selling cbabe May 2022 #7

This is straight out of some dark US history AntivaxHunters May 2022 #8

OMG GoldandSilver May 2022 #53

Supply and demand. More Republican capitalism. ZonkerHarris May 2022 #9

Agree! keithbvadu2 May 2022 #18

That is just awful. What are they going to do have baby factories with enslaved women..wouldn't Demsrule86 May 2022 #12

They are quoting a CDC study LeftInTX May 2022 #22

The funny thing is that the forced birth movement caused this lack of supply Farmer-Rick May 2022 #27

Making abortion illegal won't change this stat LeftInTX May 2022 #29

Well, I wonder Farmer-Rick May 2022 #42

Yes, they will need to stigmatize single mothers again in order for moms to give up their infants. LeftInTX May 2022 #43

WHITE Infants Deep State Witch May 2022 #13

Thank you for sharing this, Swede. ❤ littlemissmartypants May 2022 #14

It was an industry from about 1850 to the 1960s, shipping orphans and poor kids bucolic_frolic May 2022 #15

Wow, that is a punch to the gut PatSeg May 2022 #17

Alito's intentions are, shall we say, naked and unashamed now, aren't they? Hekate May 2022 #19

But what the hell does that have to do with the question of constitutionality?!?!?!?!? groundloop May 2022 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author LeftInTX May 2022 #37

Not a single thing. It's based on the fact that single women tend to keep their children nowadays LeftInTX May 2022 #38

Orphan Train Movement relocated children to foster homes in the Midwest bucolic_frolic May 2022 #21

My great grandmother may have been one of those children from NY. Delmette2.0 May 2022 #24

That doesn't feel like...that IS the Handmaid's Tale. paleotn May 2022 #23

Pure Neanderthal SpankMe May 2022 #25

Or capitalism gone mad. meadowlander May 2022 #49

What the unholy f*ck? Joinfortmill May 2022 #28

Evidently, running adoption agencies is a lucrative business. Lonestarblue May 2022 #30

follow the money housecat May 2022 #31

It doesn't feel like The Handmaid's Tale.. Pacifist Patriot May 2022 #33

So-o-o-o, if I read this right... WinstonSmith4740 May 2022 #34

Is there a shortage of kids now to adopt? Emile May 2022 #39

Yes. Single mothers keep their kids now! LeftInTX May 2022 #40

I'm glad I asked that question. Thanks for that information. Emile May 2022 #41

There's a longstanding shortage of healthy white babies meadowlander May 2022 #47

Also the standards are lower. Voltaire2 May 2022 #56

Turning newborns into a commodity. Capitalism gone bonkers. nt Ilsa May 2022 #44

So basically, Karma13612 May 2022 #50

The Fatherland must be kept strong ! More bodies ! More bodies ! nt eppur_se_muova May 2022 #51

It's not enough to take control of the bodies of potential mothers. littlemissmartypants May 2022 #52

GOP sees babies as property to be bought and sold. Irish_Dem May 2022 #54

Straight out Nazi shit. Voltaire2 May 2022 #55

Democratic adverts should say: CousinIT May 2022 #57