Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court opinion on abortion uses the phrase "domestic supply of infants." It's on page 34 [View all]bucolic_frolic
(55,179 posts)21. Orphan Train Movement relocated children to foster homes in the Midwest
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan_Train
The Orphan Train Movement was a supervised welfare program that transported children from crowded Eastern cities of the United States to foster homes located largely in rural areas of the Midwest. The orphan trains operated between 1854 and 1929, relocating about 250,000 children. The co-founders of the Orphan Train movement claimed that these children were orphaned, abandoned, abused, or homeless, but this was not always true. They were mostly the children of new immigrants and the children of the poor and destitute families living in these cities. Criticisms include ineffective screening of caretakers, insufficient follow-ups on placements, and that many children were used as strictly slave farm labor.
Three charitable institutions, Children's Village (founded 1851 by 24 philanthropists),[1] the Children's Aid Society (established 1853 by Charles Loring Brace) and later, New York Foundling Hospital, endeavored to help these children. The institutions were supported by wealthy donors and operated by professional staff. The three institutions developed a program that placed homeless, orphaned, and abandoned city children, who numbered an estimated 30,000 in New York City alone in the 1850s, in foster homes throughout the country. The children were transported to their new homes on trains that were labeled "orphan trains" or "baby trains". This relocation of children ended in the 1920s with the beginning of organized foster care in America.
Extensive article at the link
The Orphan Train Movement was a supervised welfare program that transported children from crowded Eastern cities of the United States to foster homes located largely in rural areas of the Midwest. The orphan trains operated between 1854 and 1929, relocating about 250,000 children. The co-founders of the Orphan Train movement claimed that these children were orphaned, abandoned, abused, or homeless, but this was not always true. They were mostly the children of new immigrants and the children of the poor and destitute families living in these cities. Criticisms include ineffective screening of caretakers, insufficient follow-ups on placements, and that many children were used as strictly slave farm labor.
Three charitable institutions, Children's Village (founded 1851 by 24 philanthropists),[1] the Children's Aid Society (established 1853 by Charles Loring Brace) and later, New York Foundling Hospital, endeavored to help these children. The institutions were supported by wealthy donors and operated by professional staff. The three institutions developed a program that placed homeless, orphaned, and abandoned city children, who numbered an estimated 30,000 in New York City alone in the 1850s, in foster homes throughout the country. The children were transported to their new homes on trains that were labeled "orphan trains" or "baby trains". This relocation of children ended in the 1920s with the beginning of organized foster care in America.
Extensive article at the link
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court opinion on abortion uses the phrase "domestic supply of infants." It's on page 34 [View all]
Swede
May 2022
OP
The facts are: Women who are single keep their children and no longer give them up for adoption
LeftInTX
May 2022
#35
Sort of like China's for-profit forced organ harvesting using political prisoners as donors.
sop
May 2022
#3
That is the whole point to "smaller gov't", less regs, more opportunity for corruption...
Thomas Hurt
May 2022
#11
Yes, and which groups are lobbying Congress for favorable adoption laws and materiel
bucolic_frolic
May 2022
#16
Why aren't the reporters asking these people what the government will pay per forced birth?
Tumbulu
May 2022
#5
I'm surprised some anti-abortion apologist hasn't yet argued pregnant women will now be able to
sop
May 2022
#36
There are enough idiots in that cohort that I wouldn't be surprised
littlemissmartypants
May 2022
#46
That is just awful. What are they going to do have baby factories with enslaved women..wouldn't
Demsrule86
May 2022
#12
The funny thing is that the forced birth movement caused this lack of supply
Farmer-Rick
May 2022
#27
Yes, they will need to stigmatize single mothers again in order for moms to give up their infants.
LeftInTX
May 2022
#43
It was an industry from about 1850 to the 1960s, shipping orphans and poor kids
bucolic_frolic
May 2022
#15
But what the hell does that have to do with the question of constitutionality?!?!?!?!?
groundloop
May 2022
#20
Not a single thing. It's based on the fact that single women tend to keep their children nowadays
LeftInTX
May 2022
#38
It's not enough to take control of the bodies of potential mothers.
littlemissmartypants
May 2022
#52