General Discussion

ShazzieB

(22,567 posts)

9. Yes.

Sun May 8, 2022, 08:51 PM

May 2022

But I do think some are worse than others. Alito, Thomas, and Amy Coney "if you don't want the baby, just drop it off at the firehouse, no biggie" Barrett are the worst of the worst, imnsho.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

84 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jesus H Christ. I just actually read Alito's decision... [View all] First Speaker May 2022 OP

Has no business being... 2naSalit May 2022 #1

that's true for all the SC conservatives Skittles May 2022 #6

Yes. ShazzieB May 2022 #9

nah Skittles May 2022 #17

Well,, it's all a matter of opinion anyway, lol. ShazzieB May 2022 #19

so, Kavanaugh passes your, er, test? Skittles May 2022 #22

No, he's just the more reasonable one among them and that's how fucked up the others are uponit7771 May 2022 #29

I was stuck on hating Barrett the most Tumbulu May 2022 #44

Yep, he literally outlines his opinion similar to Taney in Dred. Scott horrificness uponit7771 May 2022 #52

It's funny that you mention that because In It to Win It May 2022 #60

I'm still stuck on dispising Barrett the most, but the others are a close second housecat May 2022 #71

I think it is the bound mind thing.... Tumbulu May 2022 #81

thank you. housecat May 2022 #83

Kavanaugh is a low bar but I also think he's the more reasonable one out of the bunch In It to Win It May 2022 #53

Exactly. ShazzieB May 2022 #56

You're right ...Kavanaugh is the most likely flip... ewagner May 2022 #64

With this particular set of RWNJs, that seems to be a positive In It to Win It May 2022 #69

And he can have more beer housecat May 2022 #72

Kavanaugh has probably paid for the most abortions Demobrat May 2022 #74

Truth, he has no moral convictions, but what passes for them is self service at best. 2Gingersnaps May 2022 #77

Heehee! Love your description of those 3... brush May 2022 #33

Why, thank you! ShazzieB May 2022 #59

It's about that domestic supply of infants, doncha know. Arkansas Granny May 2022 #46

Do the "fathers" of this domestic supply of infants pay child support? housecat May 2022 #84

+1 CrispyQ May 2022 #11

Fuck every last one of those reThug-appointed, conservative Justices; wish we could impeach em all! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2022 #20

It was sloppy, wasn't it? Baitball Blogger May 2022 #2

yes... completely In It to Win It May 2022 #3

Really really batshit crazy Tumbulu May 2022 #47

Ans.: $$$ lastlib May 2022 #63

It will be tightened. speak easy May 2022 #13

I read a couple of Scalia's opinions. Same thing. Hassin Bin Sober May 2022 #21

+ 100% grantcart May 2022 #75

Any judge who has to twist himself that far - milestogo May 2022 #4

+1, even goes to the reach of calling his opinion not dependent on women because women can uponit7771 May 2022 #28

Its the old "keep your legs together" advice. milestogo May 2022 #31

Maybe all the republicans got zapped with the Jewish space lasers. blueinredohio May 2022 #5

Yes, good thing to hope for. Tumbulu May 2022 #48

Scary, isn't it? It's not just the substance and the medieval reasoning; Ocelot II May 2022 #7

+1 n/t area51 May 2022 #40

It's a hideously egregious, amateurish attempt to impose his own Christian fascists beliefs on us. Pepsidog May 2022 #51

AND Delphinus May 2022 #78

Absolutely correct. And, if I seem to recall grade school when students were taught about the first Pepsidog May 2022 #82

Truly insidious and twisted. 58Sunliner May 2022 #8

It's a draft. It's not gonna look like that in the end LeftInTX May 2022 #10

Hiding? CrispyQ May 2022 #14

He was supposed to attend a conference at the Fifth Court of Appeals last Thursday LeftInTX May 2022 #15

He's s fucking evil coward. SunSeeker May 2022 #25

Right It's not gonna look like that in the end. elleng May 2022 #36

My fear is the decision is not cleaned up, but the argument unfortunately is LeftInTX May 2022 #39

It will be very interesting to see how it's cleaned up, including/especially concurrences. elleng May 2022 #41

+1, "cleaned up" means his references to ignorance wont be there but ignoring the 9th will be uponit7771 May 2022 #66

Someone that demented really shouldn't be sitting on the bench. smirkymonkey May 2022 #12

The institution that bestowed a Juris Doctorate The Wizard May 2022 #16

Hail hail Freedonia! C Moon May 2022 #18

Alito actually did quote from a 1200s-era document. SNL didn't make that up. nt Quixote1818 May 2022 #23

What happens when crazed, religious fanatics try to interpret the Constitution paleotn May 2022 #24

Can Alito enforce this decision if the majority ignores it ? rickford66 May 2022 #26

No! By majority, I assume you mean majority of the court. LeftInTX May 2022 #34

I meant the majority of the country. rickford66 May 2022 #42

K&R, Alito RvW and Dred Scott opinions are VERY VERY close in standard and verbage uponit7771 May 2022 #27

Recommended. H2O Man May 2022 #30

+10 nt reACTIONary May 2022 #32

He is in the wrong time period. LiberalFighter May 2022 #35

He made a decision and tried to justify it with medieval bullshit! LeftInTX May 2022 #38

as are all the others housecat May 2022 #73

It has no logic of any sort to it... legally speaking. KentuckyWoman May 2022 #37

He probably didn't write it himself FakeNoose May 2022 #43

just another refuKKKchicken pumping a handcart to Hell... bringthePaine May 2022 #45

he is a severely fucked up asshole TomDaisy May 2022 #49

Pretty jarring isn't it. They just live in such a bubble and watch Fox that they actually write shit Pepsidog May 2022 #50

It reads like the words of a fanatic who is.. mvd May 2022 #54

Alito and Barrett are two examples of the right wing extremist objective. Mr. Evil May 2022 #55

The curtain has been removed! LeftInTX May 2022 #58

So let's get to work and EXPAND THE COURT!!!! calimary May 2022 #57

+1, uponit7771 May 2022 #67

Scary, Isn't It? DET May 2022 #61

He's a legal shill The Wizard May 2022 #62

Toxic Patriarchy in a judicial robe. Raster May 2022 #65

Blatant abuse of judicial authority. no_hypocrisy May 2022 #68

As a document conveying judicial reasoning to be used in other cases this provides no method. Ford_Prefect May 2022 #70

We're burning down an entire nation because of sex. Oneironaut May 2022 #76

I thought the name Icanthinkformyself May 2022 #79

Bush V. Gore and the DB45 "elections" will set us back 50 years. AZLD4Candidate May 2022 #80