General Discussion

LeftInTX

(34,223 posts)

15. He was supposed to attend a conference at the Fifth Court of Appeals last Thursday

Reply to CrispyQ (Reply #14)

Sun May 8, 2022, 08:57 PM

May 2022

He cancelled...

As he should. What he wrote has no legal logic

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

84 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jesus H Christ. I just actually read Alito's decision... [View all] First Speaker May 2022 OP

Has no business being... 2naSalit May 2022 #1

that's true for all the SC conservatives Skittles May 2022 #6

Yes. ShazzieB May 2022 #9

nah Skittles May 2022 #17

Well,, it's all a matter of opinion anyway, lol. ShazzieB May 2022 #19

so, Kavanaugh passes your, er, test? Skittles May 2022 #22

No, he's just the more reasonable one among them and that's how fucked up the others are uponit7771 May 2022 #29

I was stuck on hating Barrett the most Tumbulu May 2022 #44

Yep, he literally outlines his opinion similar to Taney in Dred. Scott horrificness uponit7771 May 2022 #52

It's funny that you mention that because In It to Win It May 2022 #60

I'm still stuck on dispising Barrett the most, but the others are a close second housecat May 2022 #71

I think it is the bound mind thing.... Tumbulu May 2022 #81

thank you. housecat May 2022 #83

Kavanaugh is a low bar but I also think he's the more reasonable one out of the bunch In It to Win It May 2022 #53

Exactly. ShazzieB May 2022 #56

You're right ...Kavanaugh is the most likely flip... ewagner May 2022 #64

With this particular set of RWNJs, that seems to be a positive In It to Win It May 2022 #69

And he can have more beer housecat May 2022 #72

Kavanaugh has probably paid for the most abortions Demobrat May 2022 #74

Truth, he has no moral convictions, but what passes for them is self service at best. 2Gingersnaps May 2022 #77

Heehee! Love your description of those 3... brush May 2022 #33

Why, thank you! ShazzieB May 2022 #59

It's about that domestic supply of infants, doncha know. Arkansas Granny May 2022 #46

Do the "fathers" of this domestic supply of infants pay child support? housecat May 2022 #84

+1 CrispyQ May 2022 #11

Fuck every last one of those reThug-appointed, conservative Justices; wish we could impeach em all! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2022 #20

It was sloppy, wasn't it? Baitball Blogger May 2022 #2

yes... completely In It to Win It May 2022 #3

Really really batshit crazy Tumbulu May 2022 #47

Ans.: $$$ lastlib May 2022 #63

It will be tightened. speak easy May 2022 #13

I read a couple of Scalia's opinions. Same thing. Hassin Bin Sober May 2022 #21

+ 100% grantcart May 2022 #75

Any judge who has to twist himself that far - milestogo May 2022 #4

+1, even goes to the reach of calling his opinion not dependent on women because women can uponit7771 May 2022 #28

Its the old "keep your legs together" advice. milestogo May 2022 #31

Maybe all the republicans got zapped with the Jewish space lasers. blueinredohio May 2022 #5

Yes, good thing to hope for. Tumbulu May 2022 #48

Scary, isn't it? It's not just the substance and the medieval reasoning; Ocelot II May 2022 #7

+1 n/t area51 May 2022 #40

It's a hideously egregious, amateurish attempt to impose his own Christian fascists beliefs on us. Pepsidog May 2022 #51

AND Delphinus May 2022 #78

Absolutely correct. And, if I seem to recall grade school when students were taught about the first Pepsidog May 2022 #82

Truly insidious and twisted. 58Sunliner May 2022 #8

It's a draft. It's not gonna look like that in the end LeftInTX May 2022 #10

Hiding? CrispyQ May 2022 #14

He was supposed to attend a conference at the Fifth Court of Appeals last Thursday LeftInTX May 2022 #15

He's s fucking evil coward. SunSeeker May 2022 #25

Right It's not gonna look like that in the end. elleng May 2022 #36

My fear is the decision is not cleaned up, but the argument unfortunately is LeftInTX May 2022 #39

It will be very interesting to see how it's cleaned up, including/especially concurrences. elleng May 2022 #41

+1, "cleaned up" means his references to ignorance wont be there but ignoring the 9th will be uponit7771 May 2022 #66

Someone that demented really shouldn't be sitting on the bench. smirkymonkey May 2022 #12

The institution that bestowed a Juris Doctorate The Wizard May 2022 #16

Hail hail Freedonia! C Moon May 2022 #18

Alito actually did quote from a 1200s-era document. SNL didn't make that up. nt Quixote1818 May 2022 #23

What happens when crazed, religious fanatics try to interpret the Constitution paleotn May 2022 #24

Can Alito enforce this decision if the majority ignores it ? rickford66 May 2022 #26

No! By majority, I assume you mean majority of the court. LeftInTX May 2022 #34

I meant the majority of the country. rickford66 May 2022 #42

K&R, Alito RvW and Dred Scott opinions are VERY VERY close in standard and verbage uponit7771 May 2022 #27

Recommended. H2O Man May 2022 #30

+10 nt reACTIONary May 2022 #32

He is in the wrong time period. LiberalFighter May 2022 #35

He made a decision and tried to justify it with medieval bullshit! LeftInTX May 2022 #38

as are all the others housecat May 2022 #73

It has no logic of any sort to it... legally speaking. KentuckyWoman May 2022 #37

He probably didn't write it himself FakeNoose May 2022 #43

just another refuKKKchicken pumping a handcart to Hell... bringthePaine May 2022 #45

he is a severely fucked up asshole TomDaisy May 2022 #49

Pretty jarring isn't it. They just live in such a bubble and watch Fox that they actually write shit Pepsidog May 2022 #50

It reads like the words of a fanatic who is.. mvd May 2022 #54

Alito and Barrett are two examples of the right wing extremist objective. Mr. Evil May 2022 #55

The curtain has been removed! LeftInTX May 2022 #58

So let's get to work and EXPAND THE COURT!!!! calimary May 2022 #57

+1, uponit7771 May 2022 #67

Scary, Isn't It? DET May 2022 #61

He's a legal shill The Wizard May 2022 #62

Toxic Patriarchy in a judicial robe. Raster May 2022 #65

Blatant abuse of judicial authority. no_hypocrisy May 2022 #68

As a document conveying judicial reasoning to be used in other cases this provides no method. Ford_Prefect May 2022 #70

We're burning down an entire nation because of sex. Oneironaut May 2022 #76

I thought the name Icanthinkformyself May 2022 #79

Bush V. Gore and the DB45 "elections" will set us back 50 years. AZLD4Candidate May 2022 #80