General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: One has absolutely NOTHING to do with the other. Leave it to Nina to conflate the 2. [View all]Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)My point is if Nina believes M4A means universal health care (and believes it's the only practical means to achieve it), then it would not be out of line to say that's it's ridiculous to claim you're 'pro-life' ... and oppose it. There likely IS a legitimate correlation in HER mind, even if others could pick it apart as you have here.
She should've said Universal Health Care, I wholly agree.
But it seems like some are reading this argument in the converse, such as that it implies that if you're pro-choice, you should therefore be pro-M4A. But that doesn't logically follow. Pro-Choice is specific to abortion, whereas 'pro-life' implies a much broader stance i.e. 'all life', for one thing, but it doesn't even logically follow period.
Anyways, I don't really like her, or M4A (as a name, at minimum), so ... I'm done explaining my point, no need to reply