Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

onenote

(46,136 posts)

12. Supreme Court justices already had protection

Reply to bigtree (Original post)

Tue May 10, 2022, 09:24 AM

May 2022

This gives members of the families of Supreme Court justices the same protection that has been given to the families of members of Congress since 1946. Specifically, it authorizes the Supreme Court police to protect members of Supreme Court Justice's families where the Marshal of the Supreme Court determines such protection is necessary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wow, they're moving like lightning to shield SCOTUS members from protesters [View all] bigtree May 2022 OP

Submit a rider that abortion clinics get the same level of protection. keithbvadu2 May 2022 #1

Exactly Rebl2 May 2022 #24

Well... Just_Vote_Dem May 2022 #2

+1 2naSalit May 2022 #15

The wealthy and powerful don't want to be reminded of Bettie May 2022 #3

They hate it when the people fight back. Irish_Dem May 2022 #5

So True Farmer-Rick May 2022 #6

Remember how... 2naSalit May 2022 #16

I had forgotten about that Bettie May 2022 #18

As far as I am concerned... 2naSalit May 2022 #20

I'm female and white Bettie May 2022 #22

Diplomats Say They Were Told Not to Make Eye Contact With Rex Tillerson Celerity May 2022 #30

Delicate little flowers Bettie May 2022 #31

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music May 2022 #23

Safety and protection are only for the GOP elite. Irish_Dem May 2022 #4

The royal guards only protect the royals Farmer-Rick May 2022 #7

They mustn't be made to feel "uncomfortable". Buns_of_Fire May 2022 #8

+1 2naSalit May 2022 #17

The vile five incompetent judges agingdem May 2022 #9

Their priorities truly suck. nt DLevine May 2022 #10

Once again acts for the elites and ignores average Americans LonePirate May 2022 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music May 2022 #25

Supreme Court justices already had protection onenote May 2022 #12

this is about Kavanaugh's house bigtree May 2022 #13

They want to be afforded the security protection that Congress received then make them in2herbs May 2022 #19

Good idea. nt Phoenix61 May 2022 #29

I'll respect their boundaries when they respect mine. Freddie May 2022 #14

This! AntivaxHunters May 2022 #26

K&R Solly Mack May 2022 #21

Where was this energy when ckinics were and are under attack? malaise May 2022 #27

Will we officially be classified as a "shithole country" when they ban abortions? . Pepsidog May 2022 #28

"Where was this energy for expanding security for election workers" BumRushDaShow May 2022 #32

House should all protection for public officials of all sorts and womens clinics... Fresh_Start May 2022 #33

Because they think they're special. They really do. BComplex May 2022 #34

Why didnt Schumer, Klobuchar and Gillibrand object to the absurd resolution Hassler May 2022 #35

Why didn't they attach codifying Roe to this bill? Arazi May 2022 #36