Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,148 posts)
37. Arguably no new law is needed.
Tue May 10, 2022, 05:40 PM
May 2022

This law has been on the books since 1950:

18 USC 1507

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It passed unanimously FBaggins May 2022 #1
What about those who are standing outside their homes? Baitball Blogger May 2022 #2
Probably sent to Russian re-education camps. Irish_Dem May 2022 #8
What about them? FBaggins May 2022 #10
As long as protesters stay off private property etc LeftInTX May 2022 #14
I think what should worry them is that their neighbors came out and let them know what Baitball Blogger May 2022 #31
I'm sure they already know their neighbors' political leanings. LeftInTX May 2022 #35
Fuck 'em n/t Polybius May 2022 #30
It extends security protection to the immediate family of justices. NYC Liberal May 2022 #3
none of those family members needed additional protection bigtree May 2022 #28
Oh I agree. NYC Liberal May 2022 #29
Submit a rider that abortion clinics get the same degree of protection. keithbvadu2 May 2022 #4
I wish they would rush so fast to protect all Americans. Irish_Dem May 2022 #5
Right? Baitball Blogger May 2022 #6
Exactly! SheltieLover May 2022 #11
+1 leftstreet May 2022 #13
THIS !!!! ☝🏾☝🏾☝🏾 uponit7771 May 2022 #15
This is the bill. onenote May 2022 #7
Glad Senate voted for Democrat Coons' bill. It will help Democratic Justices too. Hoyt May 2022 #9
Madsen v. women's health center (1992) allows protestors at abortion clinic workers houses why uponit7771 May 2022 #16
Not similar laws. onenote May 2022 #25
thx uponit7771 May 2022 #26
That's would be wrong too. Although from your link, I'm not sure that is how SC ruled. Hoyt May 2022 #27
It is probably bad law Sgent May 2022 #12
+1, uponit7771 May 2022 #17
Is it a bad law to protect families of members of Congress? onenote May 2022 #23
Probably Sgent May 2022 #36
Arguably no new law is needed. onenote May 2022 #37
It is absurd and sad hamsterjill May 2022 #18
Let them live in the same kind of environment that so many of us are living Baitball Blogger May 2022 #32
Like Texas? hamsterjill May 2022 #34
Well lets see how they vote today on the right to privacy Emile May 2022 #19
Who's voting today? Nt Tickle May 2022 #20
The senate. Emile May 2022 #21
My bad, it's Wednesday when they vote to codify. Emile May 2022 #22
Quick unanimous action with regard to Virginia Thomas Shrek May 2022 #24
Hmmm... Baitball Blogger May 2022 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has anyone read the law p...»Reply #37