Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,316 posts)
7. Link to the full editorial that doesn't have parentheses that DU trips over
Fri May 13, 2022, 06:25 PM
May 2022
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2822%2900870-4/fulltext

The ( and ) are replaced by % 28 and % 29 respectively, but without spaces after the % signs.
KNR and bookmarking. niyad May 2022 #1
K&R. intheflow May 2022 #2
Kick Nevilledog May 2022 #3
K&R Thanks for posting. n/t TeamProg May 2022 #4
Good article, but a couple of points could have been better presented. Lonestarblue May 2022 #5
++ Both correct and very important. appalachiablue May 2022 #11
Kick. MontanaMama May 2022 #6
Link to the full editorial that doesn't have parentheses that DU trips over muriel_volestrangler May 2022 #7
Can't believe no one (including me) caught that!. Thank you, I'll fix it. Nevilledog May 2022 #8
Kick BlueWavePsych May 2022 #9
What makes the writer(s) of The Lancet think the five justices give a shit? Texin May 2022 #10
Yep. This one's a keeper, for sure! calimary May 2022 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Lancet: Why Roe v. Wa...»Reply #7