Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mahina

(20,724 posts)

2. Guessing it was one of these, from SCOTUS blog

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Mon May 16, 2022, 11:43 AM

May 2022

TODAY AT THE COURT
In FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate, the court ruled 6-3 that a federal campaign-finance law limiting how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns unconstitutionally burdens core political speech.
In Patel v. Garland, the court held 5-4 that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review facts found as part of any judgment relating to the granting of discretionary relief in immigration proceedings enumerated under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fuck the Supreme Court! 🤬 [View all] In It to Win It May 2022 OP

Nuff said. All 5 of those faux Christian theocrats and their cults too. Comfortably_Numb May 2022 #1

Guessing it was one of these, from SCOTUS blog mahina May 2022 #2

It was both In It to Win It May 2022 #3

And that's what they were aiming at... 2naSalit May 2022 #4

Also: Kill the public schools, kill public health initiatives, kill the public libraries Trailrider1951 May 2022 #5

LOL, that guy doesn't look happy. KS Toronado May 2022 #6

How does the fucking worst president in US history get three SCOTUS picks? Initech May 2022 #7

The sheer force of RGB spinning in her grave Blue Owl May 2022 #8