Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)

9. No actually we don't rail about that here ...

Reply to ForgedCrank (Reply #8)

Mon May 16, 2022, 05:34 PM

May 2022

We rail ... if straight white dudes appear as favored.

Any other case is really not a problem, typically lauded.

It's cause we're all the devil, though, so I understand

The rest of your thesis though ... I tend to agree.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge: California's women on boards law is unconstitutional [View all] In It to Win It May 2022 OP

Because women are second class citizens (sarcasm) JohnSJ May 2022 #1

Although I appreciate the idea behind this law ... I suspect the Judge is right ... Hugh_Lebowski May 2022 #2

I believe this is a state court case. It won't go to the Ninth In It to Win It May 2022 #3

Okay ... it will go up the state court chain then, right? Hugh_Lebowski May 2022 #4

Yes, if the state appeals, it'll go the state's apellate court and maybe work its way up to the In It to Win It May 2022 #7

Likely because the corporation is viewed as "private property". whathehell May 2022 #5

I honestly can't remember the last time I heard a quota system upheld nt ripcord May 2022 #6

Regardless of ForgedCrank May 2022 #8

No actually we don't rail about that here ... Hugh_Lebowski May 2022 #9

Bulls**t. Then the rights of women have been violated for the last 239 years. sinkingfeeling May 2022 #10