Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kiri

(967 posts)
54. fear of being partisan destroys rule of law
Wed May 18, 2022, 01:42 PM
May 2022

I fear this paean to "scaredness of shadow" is disingenuous. The DOJ is so afraid of being "partisan" that they are paralyzed.

A good leader delegates, delegates to deputy AGs, associate AGs, so the AG does not bear all the burdens alone. There are no signs the AG has done this, except by creating a "go slow, be super cautious" environment.
Remember, the AG has no experience as a manager, ceo, leader, dept head.

Enormous damage was done and continues by Ford's pardoning Nixon. This set the stage for the AG's present timidity and inaction.
The DOJ has not pursued cases of contempt of the subpoenas. 140 days since the referrals from the Jan 6 committee.
The DOJ has not released the unredacted Mueller report.
The DOJ has not put any pressure on Republicans undermining fair elections. Dems keeping quiet is de facto endorsing, enabling.

DOJ is setting the stage for non-prosecuting Trump and his cronies. The AG is OK with SCOTUS breaking precedence, but afraid of DOJ being criticized for re-examining precedents.

Robert Reich, Glenn Kirschner, Jamie Raskin, Paul Krugman, Elizabeth Warren... have all expressed alarm at DOJ's missed opportunities.

















Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And, again yet another thread. hamsterjill May 2022 #1
Not nearly as many as the bashing and complaining threads. Ocelot II May 2022 #3
fear of being partisan destroys rule of law kiri May 2022 #54
Followed by yet another content-free attack MineralMan May 2022 #5
I'm with you... agingdem May 2022 #8
confirmation bias--thy name is kiri May 2022 #65
There is plenty of content moniss May 2022 #22
Meadows' contempt referral isn't clear cut Novara May 2022 #47
The privilege moniss May 2022 #73
And you are? What is the basis of your expertise? MineralMan May 2022 #58
Back at you moniss May 2022 #68
Great posts. hamsterjill May 2022 #75
I don't write volumes like some here. hamsterjill May 2022 #62
LOL! MineralMan May 2022 #63
Well stated. BlackSkimmer May 2022 #66
Post removed Post removed May 2022 #71
Yet another sad know it all reply. we can do it May 2022 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Peregrine Took May 2022 #35
I know, right? BlackSkimmer May 2022 #36
Yep! hamsterjill May 2022 #56
None of the listed gives any real reason Meowmee May 2022 #67
Agree. hamsterjill May 2022 #69
agree, sadly and tragically Meowmee May 2022 #70
I also wonder how many Trumpist moles remain in the DoJ Ocelot II May 2022 #2
I wonder about them all the time KS Toronado May 2022 #28
Anyone that snotty faced heap of parrot droppings appointed, nominated, or hired in any department AZLD4Candidate May 2022 #40
Some of them are probably Civil Service, so they can't be fired so easily. Ocelot II May 2022 #43
Prolly a few; I don't follow the b.s. elleng May 2022 #46
I especially wonder how many traitors work in the DOJ he inherited. Mister Ed May 2022 #4
I especially wonder if that's why, gab13by13 May 2022 #7
This might be one reason why the 1/6 committee doesn't want to turn over Ocelot II May 2022 #12
The simplest and most likely thing that Trumpsters in the DOJ might do... Mister Ed May 2022 #13
Thank You!!!Not to mention an investigation into a former POTUS requires detail yellowdogintexas May 2022 #6
It's taken 15 months to find out that DOJ gab13by13 May 2022 #11
It only took two months to find out there was an investigation Fiendish Thingy May 2022 #15
And yet, Alvin Bragg wasn't interested. gldstwmn May 2022 #51
Alvin Bragg isn't DoJ; he's the Manhattan DA. Ocelot II May 2022 #74
Kick mcar May 2022 #10
Just as significant (if not more so ): the US Attorney for DC wasn't sworn in until Nov 5 2021 Fiendish Thingy May 2022 #14
Why? Can't DOJ investigate without forming a grand jury? gab13by13 May 2022 #16
Sure they can investigate without a GJ, we just don't know anything about it Fiendish Thingy May 2022 #19
Nope, I am dumber than a box of rocks, I admit it, gab13by13 May 2022 #21
If the DOJ is doing it's job properly, they wouldn't know any more than you or I Fiendish Thingy May 2022 #32
"When he took office he took over a DOJ that was ravaged by Trump" kentuck May 2022 #17
People are frustrated that this is not wrapping up like ... Whiskeytide May 2022 #18
I listened to Frank Figliusi yesterday, gab13by13 May 2022 #23
The only statute I'm aware of that seems to ... Whiskeytide May 2022 #45
Please cite the law that makes that a crime. MineralMan May 2022 #61
Me neither DownriverDem May 2022 #34
This is a good point: Novara May 2022 #48
Exactly. Mostly, it's people who don't actually understand MineralMan May 2022 #60
Big wheels turn slowly. twodogsbarking May 2022 #20
Big fascism is moving quickly. gab13by13 May 2022 #24
Sad that we feel compelled to write these kind of apologetic OPs all the time LiberalLovinLug May 2022 #25
The base DownriverDem May 2022 #31
the problem is the longer this goes on without any charges the more it undermines the trust yaesu May 2022 #26
No it doesn't DownriverDem May 2022 #30
It shouldn't even have a whiff of being political as that would also undermine confidence. nt yaesu May 2022 #33
This is not a game. hamsterjill May 2022 #57
This Meowmee May 2022 #72
Yes! Let's stop bashing this patriot. Joinfortmill May 2022 #27
Mueller was a great patriot, too, and look what happened there. Peregrine Took May 2022 #37
Mueller was given a narrow range to work in, gab13by13 May 2022 #42
So very true DownriverDem May 2022 #29
And you know Garland is starting to look at KPN May 2022 #38
I also believe it's important to get testimony & convictions of 1/6 participants first. CaptainTruth May 2022 #39
Right, and why would he waste time doing the J6 committee's job? Novara May 2022 #41
The job of the select committee is not to gather evidence for DOJ. gab13by13 May 2022 #44
They will turn over their evidence to the DOJ. fightforfreedom May 2022 #50
Garland is hung up on the OLC memo. He's an institutionalist. gldstwmn May 2022 #49
You may very well be right. hamsterjill May 2022 #59
Then he should be fired or resign Mr. Sparkle May 2022 #64
You make sense, and I hope you are correct. It is hard not knowing what is happening, but Escurumbele May 2022 #52
Thank you, I also hope I am correct. fightforfreedom May 2022 #53
Maybe we can prosecute Trump posthumously 867-5309. May 2022 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When it comes to Garland,...»Reply #54