Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When it comes to Garland, many people, including the news media, ignored these facts. [View all]hamsterjill
(17,656 posts)62. I don't write volumes like some here.
You know, as an example - someone writing numerous paragraphs obviously bragging about how much one has. Most of us on here realize that there are many that may not have as much or anything at all. So we try not to flaunt what we may be privileged to have.
Or perhaps wanting a pat on the back for tipping someone a little extra for a job well done. Id say the majority here probably tip generously yet dont feel a need to advertise what weve done.
So, no. I dont write volumes such as that.
The OP has started numerous threads about the same subject over the last few days. My comment was in recognition of that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When it comes to Garland, many people, including the news media, ignored these facts. [View all]
fightforfreedom
May 2022
OP
Anyone that snotty faced heap of parrot droppings appointed, nominated, or hired in any department
AZLD4Candidate
May 2022
#40
Thank You!!!Not to mention an investigation into a former POTUS requires detail
yellowdogintexas
May 2022
#6
Just as significant (if not more so ): the US Attorney for DC wasn't sworn in until Nov 5 2021
Fiendish Thingy
May 2022
#14
Sure they can investigate without a GJ, we just don't know anything about it
Fiendish Thingy
May 2022
#19
If the DOJ is doing it's job properly, they wouldn't know any more than you or I
Fiendish Thingy
May 2022
#32
Sad that we feel compelled to write these kind of apologetic OPs all the time
LiberalLovinLug
May 2022
#25
the problem is the longer this goes on without any charges the more it undermines the trust
yaesu
May 2022
#26
It shouldn't even have a whiff of being political as that would also undermine confidence. nt
yaesu
May 2022
#33
I also believe it's important to get testimony & convictions of 1/6 participants first.
CaptainTruth
May 2022
#39
You make sense, and I hope you are correct. It is hard not knowing what is happening, but
Escurumbele
May 2022
#52