Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
3. cool. he should close down the Drug Czar's palace
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 12:19 AM
Jan 2012

aka The Office of National Drug Control Policy

This is a govt. expansion program started by Ronald Raygun and resulted in govt waste and failure. It is a propaganda arm of the govt., and really has no useful function other than to provide some beltway insider a big salary and title.

Health and Human Services can handle the issue of drug abuse harm reduction. The FDA and DEA can handle their jobs - honestly, this is just bureaucratic pork.

via wiki - As of 2011, the ONDCP is requesting funding for 98 full time employees, 64 (65.31%) of whom would be paid at either GS-15, GS-14, or SES pay grades, or more than $105,211.00 yearly, being adjusted for Washington, D.C. cost of living expenses.[7]

I will not, of course, hold my breath waiting for this to happen.

In addition, Obama should instruct the DEA to assume cannabis has been decriminalized and move law enforcement to illegal meth and heroin production and distribution, with the goal of providing ways for addicts to move under the purview of HHS.

more wiki

In September 2002, the Senate Appropriations Committee recommended that salaries and expenses at ONDCP be reduced from $26.6 million in fiscal 2006 to $11.5 million in fiscal 2007, to "more closely reflect actual performance." Committee members said they would request funding for a study of ONDCP by the National Academy of Public Administration. They also ordered a Government Accountability Office study on the distribution of grants. Plus, they directed the Director to provide quarterly updates on travel expenditures, staffing levels and plans for future hirings.[11]

By law, the drug czar must oppose any attempt to legalize the use (in any form) of illicit drugs.[12] According to the "Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998"[13] the director of the ONDCP

(12) shall ensure that no Federal funds appropriated to the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall be expended for any study or contract relating to the legalization (for a medical use or any other use) of a substance listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form) that -- 1. is listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812); and 2. has not been approved for use for medical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration;

The Government Accountability Office has found that this law authorizes the ONDCP to disseminate misleading information (lie) in order to oppose legalization[14]

Since when do American citizens need an office of anti-drug propaganda? Since when do we need to spend millions of dollar for their failed attempts - their work has, apparently, resulted in MORE cannabis use, not less. I'd say that demonstrates a HUGE FAILURE b/c Americans don't want the govt. to spend taxpayer dollars lying to them and they say... fuck you, in response.

They have PAID for writers to put propaganda in TV shows...wtf?

And their anti-marijuana commercials, from studies, indicated that they made females more likely to use marijuana. Two diff. studies indicated failure. Yet the office continues to lie.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2006/09/a_white_house_drug_deal_gone_bad.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Obama plays chess oh08dem Jan 2012 #1
He's taking away their issues EC Jan 2012 #2
If their issues were popular, why'd they lose in 2006 and 2008? leftstreet Jan 2012 #5
They didn't lose in 2008 izquierdista Jan 2012 #21
They don't need to be popular. EC Jan 2012 #25
cool. he should close down the Drug Czar's palace RainDog Jan 2012 #3
Wait. So now drowning gvt in a bathtub is good? leftstreet Jan 2012 #4
Yea, that's what Obama said. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #37
Not reducing government - reducing bureacracy - big difference. grantcart Jan 2012 #6
+1... redundant functions are rampant in the Fed Govt. DCBob Jan 2012 #17
I agree Shankapotomus Jan 2012 #26
That's bad policy. If the politics made up for it then cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #7
True -- he is pulling the Clinton maneuver Samantha Jan 2012 #8
The Man is Pono....he is on it.... opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #9
Good Move By the President indykatie1955 Jan 2012 #10
Question: How Many More Government Workers Will Be Laid Off ? WillyT Jan 2012 #11
It was bound to happen Summer Hathaway Jan 2012 #12
The man cannot do anything right w/o the Whiners nit pickin opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #14
You are definitely becoming one of my new faves here. Number23 Jan 2012 #45
Supposedly, the set up is to shut down the positions as people retire or move on. TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #13
According to Rachel Maddow's reporting . . . markpkessinger Jan 2012 #15
Its a GAIN...less makes for efficiency and streamlined...perfect opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #16
That is NOTHING joeglow3 Jan 2012 #24
How big is government compared to previous years? LiberalFighter Jan 2012 #18
This article has some info on that savalez Jan 2012 #30
"84% were added under Republican administrations and 16% were added under...." pnorman Jan 2012 #35
The 84% increase under Republicans are just the federal employees LiberalFighter Jan 2012 #39
It's more RW crap from a "Dem" president. Apparently RW is the new "progressive". Edweird Jan 2012 #19
The Sparkle Pony Ride starts at noon. Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #32
Smart move by the President.. politically and practically. DCBob Jan 2012 #20
What a President we got>>>Priceless...full of wisdom...so Pono... opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #22
He is awesome at out-Republicaning the Republicans. Karmadillo Jan 2012 #23
Obama MinervaX Jan 2012 #27
That's one way to silence them Shankapotomus Jan 2012 #28
The GOPers are too easy these daze....their BS not selling in a tough crowd opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #29
Hahaha!! Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #31
LOL...its nice to know people knows Rooks from knights opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #36
The msm never attacks Republican hypocrisy. savalez Jan 2012 #33
Poor GOPers OutFoxed again.....Wheres Boner these daze? opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #38
Yay. Now the public thinks shrinking government is an unmitigated good. dawg Jan 2012 #34
Some would call this "caving in". hughee99 Jan 2012 #40
me think its better than to let them GOPers to do it and claim credit opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #42
There's only "credit" to be had if you're doing something that SHOULD be done. hughee99 Jan 2012 #43
Me also thinks the move is a good one,,,therefore,,,the Pres gets a ROOK opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #44
"Obama plays chess...just got a free ROOK" His own rook. /nt Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama is Beatin...»Reply #3