Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What will happen if thousands of people can't vote [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)54. FEMA has already said they'll pay.
I don't think they can get those paper ballots distributed to all those places in a few days
We can get drones distributed to Afghanistan in under a day.
We can handle distribution of paper ballots in our own country in about a week.
Then you need the machines to read them electronically...which need power.
No, you don't.
First, if you're reprinting the absentee ballot, you'll be counting those using the Mark 1 human eyeball.
Second, if you're using an optical scan system, you've already printed and distributed the ballots. Making your first concern moot.
Third, you don't have to scan them at the polling place. Put them in a box, transfer it to the Board of Elections and scan them there. There's already a procedure for this - it's what happens anyway when the polls close!
Or you need a LOT of people ready to read and count.
Because it's January, and the President and new Congress will be sworn in a week after the election.
Oh wait, we're talking about early November.
This is a trivial problem to solve.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Today, the Director of FEMA told Governors that whatever they needed to pull the election
DonViejo
Oct 2012
#12
Yes, but can the states be FORCED to USE whatever it takes? Repub states don't WANT voters. nt
valerief
Oct 2012
#14
I'd like to see a governor refuse generators to keep polling places closed
former-republican
Oct 2012
#17
Fema director on MSM says I offered generators to the governor of (state)
former-republican
Oct 2012
#30
I'm going to disagree with you on this issue but hopefully we won't have to find out
former-republican
Oct 2012
#43
Absolutely , what governor is going to go on TV and tell his state I decided
former-republican
Oct 2012
#38
This may be a surprise, but the population density of the US isn't uniform. (nt)
Posteritatis
Oct 2012
#27
No. All the states have to have the official election on same day. They'll act before then.
Honeycombe8
Oct 2012
#13
ITA. If we all had to vote on the same day, how is it that many of us (including myself)
LisaL
Oct 2012
#36
I stand corrected. The "official" electoral college day for all the states has to be the same. So
Honeycombe8
Oct 2012
#39
There wouldn't be time to get paper ballots supplied to all polling places in all those states. nt
Honeycombe8
Oct 2012
#41
The countdown doesn't start today. It starts from when they realize they won't have power there...
Honeycombe8
Oct 2012
#52
It also assumes passable roads, both for transporting ballots and for people to get to the polls.
gkhouston
Oct 2012
#53
How are the people going to get there? How are they going to know what their local poll place is?
Honeycombe8
Oct 2012
#59