Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Novara

(6,115 posts)
20. No carve-outs. That's way too much compromise, with dead children as the inevitable result
Fri May 27, 2022, 08:36 AM
May 2022

We need a complete ban on assault weapons and semi-automatics, period. Do mandated buybacks, then arrest people who don't turn them in. The ONLY guns that should be available to civilians are for self-protection and hunting. And last time I looked, there weren't a whole lot of deer with their own AR-15s waiting for your ass to come get them. NO ONE needs these weapons. Talk to people in the military. They will tell you the purpose of these weapons is to kill a lot of humans fast. Who the fuck needs that in a civilized society?

But we're not really a civilized society, are we?

We should not compromise on this. We have to keep hammering this until we can eventually get it passed. Don't let up. DON'T let up until we elect more Dems in order to get it passed. The Dems have great issues to run on: the very LIVES of our children, autonomy of people (women and LGBT), safety in our streets, a social safety net. It's way past fucking time they start using these messages effectively. They need to be shocking. Say things like: "Do you want your children to be slaughtered in their classroom? Then elect [fill in the name of the corrupt R running against them], because they don't believe in protecting your children from being slaughtered in their classroom." Something like that, anyway. I'm sure the pros can come up with something pithy. They need to point out that every R running against them supports slaughter in the classroom. It's the truth. They need to use it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I was thinking... LakeVermilion May 2022 #1
Charles Whitman the U of Texas tower gunman WAS a veteran Model35mech May 2022 #2
Since the NRA has essentially forbidden the keeping of records, except on paper. littlemissmartypants May 2022 #9
You know that is one thing that would be a simple act for congress to do that would not offend LiberalArkie May 2022 #27
I think that's a great idea. ❤ littlemissmartypants May 2022 #30
The ones on paper should be digitized too ! Captain Zero May 2022 #46
This is not ForgedCrank May 2022 #42
Being a veteran is no more or no less a qualifier. slightlv May 2022 #17
I agree. Model35mech May 2022 #39
Perhaps any dangerous instrumentality that requires constant re-evaluation of the owner's sop May 2022 #31
Maybe. I think that Congressional passage of that would be a high hurdle. Model35mech May 2022 #38
Funny you should mention this genxlib May 2022 #4
I don't think this is a good idea. Sorry. ❤ littlemissmartypants May 2022 #5
Why have they Karma13612 May 2022 #6
Should veterans who worked on high powered radar systems LastDemocratInSC May 2022 #32
Maybe you misunderstood me Karma13612 May 2022 #43
I understood the point you were making LastDemocratInSC May 2022 #45
Ohhhhh! Karma13612 May 2022 #47
People who have served in the military 48656c6c6f20 May 2022 #8
They can get one now... LakeVermilion May 2022 #14
And I want them to be 48656c6c6f20 May 2022 #21
No, no, no... llmart May 2022 #24
In the military, unless you're in a specific training regimen or combat.... paleotn May 2022 #26
Very accurate, MarineCombatEngineer May 2022 #36
But why do they need them after they are no longer in the military? GoodRaisin May 2022 #41
Hopefully they'll Tickle May 2022 #3
Yes, I like Karma13612 May 2022 #7
How would they know? Fla_Democrat May 2022 #10
I carried an M-16 in combat The Wizard May 2022 #12
I don't know 🤷‍♀️ Tickle May 2022 #13
What about the 400 milllion guns already out there? leftyladyfrommo May 2022 #11
You start by making weapons of war illegal Liberal In Texas May 2022 #15
Best and simplest answer yet. llmart May 2022 #35
There are very few records as to who has such guns Kaleva May 2022 #40
It's important to control ammunition too radical noodle May 2022 #28
Yes. And put a tax on each round. Liberal In Texas May 2022 #29
They're saying the answer is more guns IronLionZion May 2022 #16
This is a moral issue disguised as freedom dlk May 2022 #18
Exactly! IrishAfricanAmerican May 2022 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author spanone May 2022 #19
No carve-outs. That's way too much compromise, with dead children as the inevitable result Novara May 2022 #20
I could not agree with you more. llmart May 2022 #37
"We should not compromise on this" forthemiddle May 2022 #48
You make a good point but I don't agree. Novara May 2022 #49
Unfortunately then nothing will get done. forthemiddle May 2022 #50
nothing WILL get done - that's my point Novara May 2022 #51
Pushing back while covered in the blood of children and their teachers...once again. paleotn May 2022 #22
Gun humpers! Maine Abu El Banat May 2022 #23
Glock has a new handgun model. LastDemocratInSC May 2022 #33
. Maine Abu El Banat May 2022 #34
AR-15 supporters are supporters of those terrorist that have murdered Americans rockfordfile May 2022 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The gun humpers are out i...»Reply #20