General Discussion

James48

(5,162 posts)

5. Nope. Waaaay to much in one go.

Reply to Botany (Reply #4)

Sat May 28, 2022, 06:02 AM

May 2022

That will never pass the Senate.

You have to break it into smaller pieces. MAYBE you might get a piece or two to fly.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Armor piercing bullets and high clip magazines can be banned without delay. [View all] Samrob May 2022 OP

AMEN! 634-5789 May 2022 #1

Let our Elected cowards know! True Blue American May 2022 #2

Very important and easy to do. The Jungle 1 May 2022 #8

And there's certainly nothing in the 2nd Amendment that prohibits liability lawsuits. Mister Ed May 2022 #3

Unless I'm mistaken (and I'm not a lawyer so that's entirely possible)... Jedi Guy May 2022 #48

You're likely right, and they'd likely win. Still, no need for a law against filing suit. n/t Mister Ed May 2022 #49

H.R. 127 was passed in April of 2021 by the House the Senate could vote it out in an hour. Botany May 2022 #4

Nope. Waaaay to much in one go. James48 May 2022 #5

Court would strike that down immediately. Lurker Deluxe May 2022 #31

what is a high clip magazine? nt mitch96 May 2022 #6

I was waiting for it and you delivered. twodogsbarking May 2022 #7

I'm positive that you know the answer to that. MineralMan May 2022 #14

Thank you. Mosby May 2022 #26

Can that be used for other issues? LiberatedUSA May 2022 #46

A cross between High Times and American Salon magazines RaDaR63 May 2022 #45

Sensible solutions Generic Brad May 2022 #9

Define "armor piercing bullet", please. sir pball May 2022 #10

I was waiting for it and you delivered. twodogsbarking May 2022 #15

It takes a while for good info to emerge SYFROYH May 2022 #16

It's a legitimate question sir pball May 2022 #17

Thanks for delivering even more. twodogsbarking May 2022 #18

Lol, what? sir pball May 2022 #19

And yet even more. twodogsbarking May 2022 #20

Bwhaha +1 Emile May 2022 #23

I'm smiling. twodogsbarking May 2022 #30

Do you realize just how.............oh never mind MarineCombatEngineer May 2022 #24

Thanks. twodogsbarking May 2022 #29

Hahaha, I get it, you think I'm "flooding the zone with shit" sir pball May 2022 #27

I made no comments either for or against any kind of weapon. twodogsbarking May 2022 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 May 2022 #32

Of course not dear, you merely remarked against certain "bullets". sir pball May 2022 #34

I mentioned nothing that you stated. twodogsbarking May 2022 #36

You are correct, I was assuming you were OP. sir pball May 2022 #37

Yep. Stay well. twodogsbarking May 2022 #39

Mmm, I figured as such. Humor me one last time sir pball May 2022 #42

I am not the OP. twodogsbarking May 2022 #47

I am not speaking to you as if you are the OP. I'm addressing your intial reply to me. sir pball May 2022 #51

Give it up. twodogsbarking May 2022 #52

A ban on HUNTING ammunition would turn the entire Midwest red NickB79 May 2022 #35

Nice straw man mcar May 2022 #38

ELI5 how it's a "straw man", please? sir pball May 2022 #40

a high-capacity magazine ban would probably not survive a court challenge. cab67 May 2022 #11

Get the NRA under scrupulous review. Snarkoleptic May 2022 #12

Adopt California Gun Law Gymbo May 2022 #13

Lol Zeitghost May 2022 #21

Google California compliant rifles before you get too excited. Nt hack89 May 2022 #33

We certainly must do that. And then we will have to deal librechik May 2022 #22

Hell if TFG can get bump stocks outlawed, this shouldn't be a problem! Emile May 2022 #25

I have to ask a clarification question sarisataka May 2022 #41

Stop with the gibberish, gunner! /s nt sir pball May 2022 #43

So I guess there is nothing to discuss sarisataka May 2022 #44

What do you mean by "banned without delay"? Do you think there are 60 votes in the Senate? tritsofme May 2022 #50

Here's an idea. moondust May 2022 #53