Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Orrex

(67,236 posts)

2. This policy is directly incompatible with "qualified immunity"

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Sat May 28, 2022, 07:08 AM

May 2022

If they have no obligation to act, then they should get no protection for their bad actions.

And we should admit on the national level that all of the military hardware that they wear, carry, and drive is simply a big exercise in masturbation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2005 SCOTUS decision: Police have discretion, no obligation, over whether or not to stop a killer. [View all] DetlefK May 2022 OP

Well that will cause some self-arming citizens to take notice bucolic_frolic May 2022 #1

This policy is directly incompatible with "qualified immunity" Orrex May 2022 #2

this mopinko May 2022 #5

... Ferrets are Cool May 2022 #6

Law enforcement in this nation is a big mess. The Jungle 1 May 2022 #10

i ended up on the crazy lady list. mopinko May 2022 #20

Sounds horrific Marthe48 May 2022 #17

it was, but mopinko May 2022 #21

Good for you Marthe48 May 2022 #22

I'm surprised no one has challenged qualified immunity with this argument Novara May 2022 #12

This SCOTUS is no longer befitting of Article 3. ck4829 May 2022 #3

The Gonzales case was a 7-2 opinion. madaboutharry May 2022 #4

The police are there to protect property of the wealthy, sinkingfeeling May 2022 #9

Your headline is 100% correct. The Jungle 1 May 2022 #13

Remind me again why we are paying these useless bullies and murderers niyad May 2022 #7

If the police are not required to protect, we are not required to have police forces sanatanadharma May 2022 #8

This is an excellent observation. harumph May 2022 #16

And that's one reason we as a nation are armed to the teeth NickB79 May 2022 #11

What an absolutely ridiculous SCOTUS ruling. llmart May 2022 #14

"dark truth: Such a lawsuit is almost certainly doomed from the get-go." BumRushDaShow May 2022 #15

Their role is rooted in protecting capital, chasing people escaping slavery, and oppressing WhiskeyGrinder May 2022 #18

So police are just people in uniform Marthe48 May 2022 #19