Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

kabelad

(38 posts)
39. Not entirely true
Mon May 30, 2022, 06:27 PM
May 2022

In the 30s, 38 was rendered useless because it couldn’t penetrate car hoods and doors, and body armor, causing issues with bootleggers. 38 super was introduced then 1935 saw the introduction of 357 magnum. This was at a time when the bad guys were using the Thompson machine gun and the BAR. To say duty weapons moved to semi autos because of what the public had is disgenious. the 357 stayed the duty pistol until it was eclipsed by 9mm in the 80s. As a side note, someone with a 357 magnum revolver and some speed clips can fire as fast and reload and be more devastating then a semi auto and a 15 round magazine. The 357 used in duty is still considered one of the most lethal rounds in history. But I’m the 30s police were using revolvers against a population that could legally purchase fully automatic weapons, up until about 1934 when most states and the federal government made gun control laws. But semi autos were a progression in technology, not a necessity in an arms race.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Background checks for 18 yr olds are useless [View all] senseandsensibility May 2022 OP
Agree LeftInTX May 2022 #1
Exactly. senseandsensibility May 2022 #2
You can buy an assault weapon at 18 but can't rent a car until you are 25? LoisB May 2022 #3
rental companies make a financially based decision on who they rent to DBoon May 2022 #19
Also, their insurance costs more if they rent to younger drivers. MineralMan May 2022 #20
Both of which are why California now has a Texas abortion law style anti assault rifle law NullTuples May 2022 #30
Not yet Zeitghost May 2022 #38
Good point, thanks. NullTuples May 2022 #51
I saw that. Such a good point. He then said if we wait to allow gun ownership till 21 then there is applegrove May 2022 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author maxsolomon May 2022 #5
No he was not..Texas school shooter wasn't arrested for threat in 2018, officials say LeftInTX May 2022 #25
OK, thanks for clearing that up. maxsolomon May 2022 #33
Delete USALiberal May 2022 #36
You could say it nicely. maxsolomon May 2022 #47
Not just wiping the juvenile record clean DBoon May 2022 #6
Cannot agree Hangingon May 2022 #7
Can't agree with what? maxsolomon May 2022 #9
I don't know if they are wiped out. Hangingon May 2022 #10
Sometimes juveniles are charged "as adults"...In those cases, they will have records LeftInTX May 2022 #24
If they were charged as an adult it will show up on a back Phoenix61 May 2022 #28
Make the minimum age for semi-automatic death machines Jerry2144 May 2022 #8
A civilian shouldn't own that type weapon period. There doc03 May 2022 #11
right, but that's not what I said Jerry2144 May 2022 #18
Why make an exemption for the law? LiberatedUSA May 2022 #21
Cops didn't need semi-auto technology until civilians doc03 May 2022 #22
Not entirely true kabelad May 2022 #39
The 1980s is when the civilian arms race started which IMO was why COPs went to the semi autos. doc03 May 2022 #43
Court just struck down a California law mandating 21 minimum age leftieNanner May 2022 #12
Ban assault weapons, period. Pobeka May 2022 #13
Agree. mzmolly May 2022 #15
Won't stand up to the Courts. WarGamer May 2022 #27
It did before. Pobeka May 2022 #48
Sorry... it won't WarGamer May 2022 #49
+1000 llmart May 2022 #50
Reinstating the assault weapons ban is my preference. mzmolly May 2022 #14
I think 25 is reasonable for semi-autos. SYFROYH May 2022 #16
You are right mcar May 2022 #17
If we are going to attack this problem with legislation, Mr.Bill May 2022 #23
The age limit thing has already been shot down by the Courts... WarGamer May 2022 #26
There is no federal law prohibiting a minor from owning an AR15 Kaleva May 2022 #29
ban assault weapons ! towerbum May 2022 #31
many states do look at juvy records thatdemguy May 2022 #32
Assault weapons are not Traildogbob May 2022 #34
Even the damn NRA conceded this point IronLionZion May 2022 #35
Some are minors and have used their parents gun(s). Kaleva May 2022 #45
Background checks is a given. Nobody can argue that point. We need kacekwl May 2022 #37
Banning assault weapons or weapons meant for soldiers at war is not useless. nt Samrob May 2022 #40
Did I say it was? senseandsensibility May 2022 #42
Few, if any, military around the world arms their soldiers with these weapons. Kaleva May 2022 #46
As someone who supports legal ownership I see no issues with the following kabelad May 2022 #41
Who said "background check" only means police record check? gulliver May 2022 #44
25. Young men's brains are not fully formed until age 25. ecstatic May 2022 #52
Good point. Dark n Stormy Knight May 2022 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Background checks for 18 ...»Reply #39