Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(17,266 posts)

5. It's an interesting interpretation.

Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:34 AM

Oct 2012

I'd pursue trespassing charges against the PD. The surveillance may be legal, but their trespassing was not.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Police allowed to install cameras on private property without warrant [View all] AsahinaKimi Oct 2012 OP

Whittle, whittle, whittle. JimDandy Oct 2012 #3

Did the court just rule that land is not property? Scootaloo Oct 2012 #4

It's an interesting interpretation. The Doctor. Oct 2012 #5

Good point. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2012 #6