Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is the firearms issue being treated as a zero sum game? [View all]SYFROYH
(34,214 posts)2. Its interesting that you bring up a zero sum game.
Its true that gun restriction is viewed as a loss by gun rights folks and lessening restrictions is viewed as a loss to gun control advocates.
In mediations we try to reframe these kind of arguments so that its not a zero sum game.
I wonder if it can be done
Ive tried to make the xase that in order to get some gun control that is effective that we give up on some gun control that probably doesnt impact gun violence.
Its hard to get either side to budge.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Have you ever tried arguing with 2A absolutionists? It's like talking to a brick wall.
Initech
Jun 2022
#1
While I'm sure that opinion makes you feel righteous, it achieves nothing.
NutmegYankee
Jun 2022
#16
Typically, a gun safety argument will work. Heller actually allows for safety based regulations.
haele
Jun 2022
#5