Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is the firearms issue being treated as a zero sum game? [View all]Straw Man
(6,949 posts)27. Who are "they"?
Regular gun people do not defend automatic weapons. Only the crazed gun nuts. And it is this group that must be utterly disabused of their power and influence.
How do you define "regular gun people"? There is a wide spectrum of opinion among gun owners and even among gun-rights proponents. If "regular gun people do not defend automatic weapons," why are semi-automatic rifles, from the Ruger 10/22 plinker to the AR-15, the most popular rifles in America?
Casting your political opposition as a monstrous, monolithic caricature only exacerbates the problem. It further radicalizes the gun culture and moves any possible solutions further and further into a nebulous future.
Good luck with that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Have you ever tried arguing with 2A absolutionists? It's like talking to a brick wall.
Initech
Jun 2022
#1
While I'm sure that opinion makes you feel righteous, it achieves nothing.
NutmegYankee
Jun 2022
#16
Typically, a gun safety argument will work. Heller actually allows for safety based regulations.
haele
Jun 2022
#5