Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A House Democrat plans to introduce a bill that would hit AR-15's with a 1,000% tax -- and [View all]48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)26. Where is the clause against mandating
Liability insurance? Is it before or after the missing comma?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
185 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A House Democrat plans to introduce a bill that would hit AR-15's with a 1,000% tax -- and [View all]
In It to Win It
Jun 2022
OP
if you saw off the barrel of a rifle there a good chance you commit a federal crime
moonshinegnomie
Jun 2022
#174
In Lansing and some others, police are prohibited from stopping people for non moving violations
MichMan
Jun 2022
#132
AR-15 style guns can be chambered to fire anything from .22 LRs to shotgun shells.
Kaleva
Jun 2022
#164
Liquor,cigarettes and hotels are not specifically mentioned in the Bill of Rights either
MichMan
Jun 2022
#52
It is about insuring individuals for damages caused by guns (including unintentional damages).
waterwatcher123
Jun 2022
#98
I agree that the insurance angle is a much better way to go. Raising taxes can be used against us
Ferrets are Cool
Jun 2022
#69
I want all semi-automatic rifles banned, not just military style weapons, we don't need them.
fightforfreedom
Jun 2022
#21
So when a bank robber is firing a long gun at officers you want them to fire bean bags back?
EX500rider
Jun 2022
#110
Because you don't go up against someone with a real gun with just a beanbag shotgun or 40-mike-mike.
Jedi Guy
Jun 2022
#142
I certainly hope this passes. 1000% tax would keep most from buying these killing machines.
Stuart G
Jun 2022
#37
I can't believe a sitting lawmaker would suggest something already determined to the unconstitional
ripcord
Jun 2022
#53
The Constitution prohibits laws that prevent people to have guns so this will be unlikely to
cstanleytech
Jun 2022
#54
I suppose if you only look at my last 20 or so posts but I discuss all types of things.
EX500rider
Jun 2022
#156
An auto has a higher rate then a semi-auto which has a higher rate then a bolt action....
Kaleva
Jun 2022
#178
What if the legislation said "X gun cannot fire more than 1 round per second under any conditions"
CaptainTruth
Jun 2022
#183