Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

question everything

(52,601 posts)
Sun Jun 5, 2022, 12:58 PM Jun 2022

Interesting comments by Christie about DOJ not indicting Meadows [View all]

CHRISTIE: Right. So -- so it does tell you that Meadows has done some cooperating with them by turning over a lot of text messages which has given a lot of information. And we don’t know what Scavino’s given over or not.

My point on this is, it tells you that Meadows and Scavino have given a quantum of cooperation. We don't know how much. We probably won’t know until other indictments are brought. But – and Navarro probably stone walled them. And so when you're a prosecutor, if you’ve got somebody who’s not giving you everything you want but an important matter has given you some of what you want, you don’t want to indict, because if you indict, then it shuts it down.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/week-transcript-22-secretary-pete-buttigieg-rep-tom/story?id=85181757

and scroll all the way down

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Interesting comments by C...