Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is the firearms issue being treated as a zero sum game? [View all]Straw Man
(6,959 posts)43. Your math is flawed.
If you "gave 95% away," you would have 5%. You would not be in the negative. You would be 1/20th of the way to your goal.
If you start with the "whole thing," you will get nothing. You will meet fanatical opposition and absolute intransigence. You will have lost the uncommitted middle, which I assure you does exist. I've met them and talked to them.
Raising the age to 21 and requiring licensing for all semi-auto firearms would go a long way toward addressing the problem. Or you could just let the perfect be the enemy of the good, and get nowhere.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Have you ever tried arguing with 2A absolutionists? It's like talking to a brick wall.
Initech
Jun 2022
#1
While I'm sure that opinion makes you feel righteous, it achieves nothing.
NutmegYankee
Jun 2022
#16
Typically, a gun safety argument will work. Heller actually allows for safety based regulations.
haele
Jun 2022
#5