Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Novara

(6,115 posts)
2. I don't quite understand how state maps end up at the SCOTUS considering the 10th A.
Mon Jun 6, 2022, 12:28 PM
Jun 2022

All this bullshit about "states' rights" - so how does the SCOTUS decide on a state's case regarding how their maps are drawn?

I'm not making a judgment about this case but I'm wondering how gerrymander cases don't end at the state level because it's a state's interest.

Any Constitutional scholars out there who can explain it? Does the SCOTUS assume there's an interest to the entire country when a state screws with their maps?

And if so, isn't that the best case of all for making sure all districts are drawn fairly by nonpartisans in every single state every single time?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court May Hear '8...»Reply #2