General Discussion

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)

47. Lets say all the naysayers are correct, Garland charges no one at the top.

Reply to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2022, 07:06 PM

Jun 2022

Then what? Garland would have to explain why he did not charge people that have clearly committed crimes. We all know it. You know who else would have to explain why no one was charged, Biden, The man who Trump tried to over throw.

Also, if Garland does not charge people at the top who have clearly committed crimes, that would severely damage the Democrats politically. The Republicans would immediately tell the American people we told you so. This was a witch hunt and the Democrats lied to you. You can not trust the Democrats, they are liars. You know they would say that.

This scenario is unrealistic, Unimaginable ,That's why I believe I will be proven correct. People at the top are going down. I don't know who, how many and I don't know if it will reach Trump. This investigation is going to play out, it's not ending any time soon.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I know when Garland is going to charge people at the top. [View all] fightforfreedom Jun 2022 OP

I know when Garland is not going to charge people at the top SoonerPride Jun 2022 #1

Pathetic we can do it Jun 2022 #2

Facts are stubborn things SoonerPride Jun 2022 #6

Present some. we can do it Jun 2022 #9

Exactly. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #11

The only thing we know is that it hasn't happened. This is like the god thing. JanMichael Jun 2022 #26

There were no indictments of higher up trump officials today SoonerPride Jun 2022 #32

Why don't you? Treefrog Jun 2022 #42

Trump has been committing crimes for at least 50 years SoonerPride Jun 2022 #66

Lol, well played. BlackSkimmer Jun 2022 #5

+1 Chautauquas Jun 2022 #16

LOL jalan48 Jun 2022 #22

SoonerPride is either an expert at irony ... Trumpdumper Jun 2022 #50

Heres another one. CrackityJones75 Jun 2022 #62

They are investigating more people than normally would be. LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #3

Some people act like this is a normal investigation, piece of cake. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #10

The Watergate investigation took over two years. LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #64

Right. elleng Jun 2022 #13

'Then you have to build a case,' imagine THAT!!! elleng Jun 2022 #4

Yeah they've only had a year and a half SoonerPride Jun 2022 #7

A year and half and over 800 people charged. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #14

Low level nobodies SoonerPride Jun 2022 #36

and after nearly a year the J6 committee agingdem Jun 2022 #21

A year and a half to charge over 850 people comes to Beastly Boy Jun 2022 #23

We expected charges against the trump admin Voltaire2 Jun 2022 #30

That's what I undderstand you expected. So the 850 charges don't count? Beastly Boy Jun 2022 #59

Apparently. nt BlackSkimmer Jun 2022 #28

Garland started March 11, 2021. Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #52

I posted about this recently. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #53

The DOJ did not begin operating on 3/11/21, a non partisan organization would've started ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #60

You think the DOJ was operating as a non-partisan Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #69

NO! But do you think its operating as a non partisan organization now? You think DOJ is going to... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #70

😂😂😂😀😀😂😂😀 Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #71

I'll take this non answer as you knowing its a partisan organization that AGG has to clean out ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #72

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #73

Copium turned up to 12 on a 10 scale uponit7771 Jun 2022 #74

😂😂😂😂😀😂😀 Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #87

he won't charge anyone at the top. Democracy is at stake and we can keep playing our games. samsingh Jun 2022 #8

Of course he won't. nt BlackSkimmer Jun 2022 #31

The real issue isn't whether he is doing anything but whether he can reasonably be expected... Thomas Hurt Jun 2022 #12

Jan 6th isn't the first crime, or even the last...... getagrip_already Jun 2022 #15

We should start a pool...guess who will be indicted, tried and convicted, and when. sop Jun 2022 #17

Thought I'd see "when hell freezes over" 867-5309. Jun 2022 #18

Well, in a way.... getagrip_already Jun 2022 #20

It's complicated. Crime on steroids produces rage? czarjak Jun 2022 #19

K&R malaise Jun 2022 #24

But in last week's LAW& ORDER, the investigation and trial took only 44 MINUTES! brooklynite Jun 2022 #25

You beat me to it, LOL Novara Jun 2022 #27

That is the dopiest comment, and yet it is always repeated when this discussion comes up. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #34

Do you recall how long it took for indictments in Watergate? brooklynite Jun 2022 #37

And in that year and a half, nothing has been done to prevent the SAME people who Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #44

No its not... brooklynite Jun 2022 #45

Sure it is. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #46

Comparing the time table of Watergate to Jan 6th investigation is ridiculous. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #48

Well, of course it's ridiculous. I wasn't the one who brought it up. But as long as it was, Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #49

Also, newdayneeded Jun 2022 #76

Caught red handed at the scene treestar Jun 2022 #86

I bet an insurrection would definitely have a part 2 and 3?... agingdem Jun 2022 #38

Sweeps months are pretty much gone as a programming concept. brooklynite Jun 2022 #39

He can't even bring contempt charges Voltaire2 Jun 2022 #29

But you don't know IF Garland is going to charge people at the top. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #33

I really am skeptical that he will. Treefrog Jun 2022 #41

Of the 800 cases (or whatever number they are juggling) I only care about maybe 20. Chainfire Jun 2022 #35

Too funny. Treefrog Jun 2022 #40

I know too Meowmee Jun 2022 #43

Lets say all the naysayers are correct, Garland charges no one at the top. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #47

And that's a perfectly valid opinion. But it is just an opinion, and there are others that are just Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #51

Garland would not "have to explain" anything and can tell congress to fuck off ........... too. uponit7771 Jun 2022 #61

he is already letting people off the hook for egregious activity Skittles Jun 2022 #54

"Many" have not been charged with seditious conspiracy. former9thward Jun 2022 #55

16 people have been charges with seditious conspiracy. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #56

16 out of 800 is not "many" former9thward Jun 2022 #58

Yes, 16 it is many and there is video proof of ties. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #63

In no universe is 2% "many" SoonerPride Jun 2022 #67

I feel like you posted this last week. maxsolomon Jun 2022 #57

The OP will post it again next week SoonerPride Jun 2022 #65

And someone else will post a rant about how Garland isn't doing his job... brooklynite Jun 2022 #68

At this point the only function of these OPs is to stir shit. While I have seen Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #75

The point of posts like this is to remind people of this. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #77

Stir, stir, stir. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #79

The point of posts like this is to remind people of this. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #78

Why do you need everyone to agree with your opinion about the outcome of a topic where no one Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #80

Not my opinion, facts. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #81

LOL! No, dear. I'm not upset at all. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #82

Instead of these pointless circlular screeds, report to us when high levels are charged and arrested msfiddlestix Jun 2022 #83

Garland is a patriot. The end. Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #84

Yes. Watergate was much easier when it came out treestar Jun 2022 #85