General Discussion

Skittles

(170,427 posts)

54. he is already letting people off the hook for egregious activity

Reply to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2022, 08:09 PM

Jun 2022

ya know?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I know when Garland is going to charge people at the top. [View all] fightforfreedom Jun 2022 OP

I know when Garland is not going to charge people at the top SoonerPride Jun 2022 #1

Pathetic we can do it Jun 2022 #2

Facts are stubborn things SoonerPride Jun 2022 #6

Present some. we can do it Jun 2022 #9

Exactly. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #11

The only thing we know is that it hasn't happened. This is like the god thing. JanMichael Jun 2022 #26

There were no indictments of higher up trump officials today SoonerPride Jun 2022 #32

Why don't you? Treefrog Jun 2022 #42

Trump has been committing crimes for at least 50 years SoonerPride Jun 2022 #66

Lol, well played. BlackSkimmer Jun 2022 #5

+1 Chautauquas Jun 2022 #16

LOL jalan48 Jun 2022 #22

SoonerPride is either an expert at irony ... Trumpdumper Jun 2022 #50

Heres another one. CrackityJones75 Jun 2022 #62

They are investigating more people than normally would be. LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #3

Some people act like this is a normal investigation, piece of cake. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #10

The Watergate investigation took over two years. LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #64

Right. elleng Jun 2022 #13

'Then you have to build a case,' imagine THAT!!! elleng Jun 2022 #4

Yeah they've only had a year and a half SoonerPride Jun 2022 #7

A year and half and over 800 people charged. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #14

Low level nobodies SoonerPride Jun 2022 #36

and after nearly a year the J6 committee agingdem Jun 2022 #21

A year and a half to charge over 850 people comes to Beastly Boy Jun 2022 #23

We expected charges against the trump admin Voltaire2 Jun 2022 #30

That's what I undderstand you expected. So the 850 charges don't count? Beastly Boy Jun 2022 #59

Apparently. nt BlackSkimmer Jun 2022 #28

Garland started March 11, 2021. Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #52

I posted about this recently. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #53

The DOJ did not begin operating on 3/11/21, a non partisan organization would've started ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #60

You think the DOJ was operating as a non-partisan Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #69

NO! But do you think its operating as a non partisan organization now? You think DOJ is going to... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #70

😂😂😂😀😀😂😂😀 Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #71

I'll take this non answer as you knowing its a partisan organization that AGG has to clean out ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #72

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #73

Copium turned up to 12 on a 10 scale uponit7771 Jun 2022 #74

😂😂😂😂😀😂😀 Phoenix61 Jun 2022 #87

he won't charge anyone at the top. Democracy is at stake and we can keep playing our games. samsingh Jun 2022 #8

Of course he won't. nt BlackSkimmer Jun 2022 #31

The real issue isn't whether he is doing anything but whether he can reasonably be expected... Thomas Hurt Jun 2022 #12

Jan 6th isn't the first crime, or even the last...... getagrip_already Jun 2022 #15

We should start a pool...guess who will be indicted, tried and convicted, and when. sop Jun 2022 #17

Thought I'd see "when hell freezes over" 867-5309. Jun 2022 #18

Well, in a way.... getagrip_already Jun 2022 #20

It's complicated. Crime on steroids produces rage? czarjak Jun 2022 #19

K&R malaise Jun 2022 #24

But in last week's LAW& ORDER, the investigation and trial took only 44 MINUTES! brooklynite Jun 2022 #25

You beat me to it, LOL Novara Jun 2022 #27

That is the dopiest comment, and yet it is always repeated when this discussion comes up. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #34

Do you recall how long it took for indictments in Watergate? brooklynite Jun 2022 #37

And in that year and a half, nothing has been done to prevent the SAME people who Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #44

No its not... brooklynite Jun 2022 #45

Sure it is. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #46

Comparing the time table of Watergate to Jan 6th investigation is ridiculous. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #48

Well, of course it's ridiculous. I wasn't the one who brought it up. But as long as it was, Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #49

Also, newdayneeded Jun 2022 #76

Caught red handed at the scene treestar Jun 2022 #86

I bet an insurrection would definitely have a part 2 and 3?... agingdem Jun 2022 #38

Sweeps months are pretty much gone as a programming concept. brooklynite Jun 2022 #39

He can't even bring contempt charges Voltaire2 Jun 2022 #29

But you don't know IF Garland is going to charge people at the top. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #33

I really am skeptical that he will. Treefrog Jun 2022 #41

Of the 800 cases (or whatever number they are juggling) I only care about maybe 20. Chainfire Jun 2022 #35

Too funny. Treefrog Jun 2022 #40

I know too Meowmee Jun 2022 #43

Lets say all the naysayers are correct, Garland charges no one at the top. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #47

And that's a perfectly valid opinion. But it is just an opinion, and there are others that are just Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #51

Garland would not "have to explain" anything and can tell congress to fuck off ........... too. uponit7771 Jun 2022 #61

he is already letting people off the hook for egregious activity Skittles Jun 2022 #54

"Many" have not been charged with seditious conspiracy. former9thward Jun 2022 #55

16 people have been charges with seditious conspiracy. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #56

16 out of 800 is not "many" former9thward Jun 2022 #58

Yes, 16 it is many and there is video proof of ties. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #63

In no universe is 2% "many" SoonerPride Jun 2022 #67

I feel like you posted this last week. maxsolomon Jun 2022 #57

The OP will post it again next week SoonerPride Jun 2022 #65

And someone else will post a rant about how Garland isn't doing his job... brooklynite Jun 2022 #68

At this point the only function of these OPs is to stir shit. While I have seen Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #75

The point of posts like this is to remind people of this. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #77

Stir, stir, stir. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #79

The point of posts like this is to remind people of this. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #78

Why do you need everyone to agree with your opinion about the outcome of a topic where no one Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #80

Not my opinion, facts. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #81

LOL! No, dear. I'm not upset at all. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #82

Instead of these pointless circlular screeds, report to us when high levels are charged and arrested msfiddlestix Jun 2022 #83

Garland is a patriot. The end. Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #84

Yes. Watergate was much easier when it came out treestar Jun 2022 #85